Detección de modelos mentales como posibilidades semánticas para el análisis del pensamiento social

Bravo, Leyla Danae Torres; Sallán, Joaquín Gairín

doi:10.6035/clr.2019.21.9

Cited by 2 publications

(1 citation statement)

References 11 publications

Supporting

Mentioning

Contrasting

Order By: Relevance

“…In (24), '◊' is the modal operator of possibility. It represents the fact that the formula following it (in this case, p ∧¬q) is true in at least a possible world.…”

Section: Modal Logic L-truth and L-falsitymentioning

confidence: 99%

Stoic Logic Allows Understanding a Priori Falsity in the Conditional

López‐Astorga

2021

StALan

View full text Add to dashboard Cite

An issue to explain in cognitive science is nowadays the case of certain conditionals that people seem to deem as a priori false. Those conditionals appear to be false by virtue of semantics: the meanings of their antecedents and their consequents seem not to admit any link between them. This is a problem because, from the point of view of classical logic, they are not always false; there can be situations in which they are true (as classical logic provides, whenever their antecedents are false, those conditionals in entirety are true). There are contemporary frameworks explaining this phenomenon (e.g., the theory of mental models). However, this paper tries to make the point that the solution might be already in ancient philosophy: in particular, in Chrysippus’ logic. Thus, the paper describes in details (1) why those conditionals are controversial in classical logic and (2) the account that can be given for them from Chrysippus’ philosophy. That account is based mainly on the Stoic idea that the negation of the second clause of a conditional should not be compatible with its first clause.

show abstract

“…In (24), '◊' is the modal operator of possibility. It represents the fact that the formula following it (in this case, p ∧¬q) is true in at least a possible world.…”

Section: Modal Logic L-truth and L-falsitymentioning

confidence: 99%

Stoic Logic Allows Understanding a Priori Falsity in the Conditional

López‐Astorga

2021

StALan

View full text Add to dashboard Cite

show abstract

Formal inferences and their relationships to knowledge acquisition: mental models and semantic links

Astorga

Torres-Bravo

2020

Principia

View full text Add to dashboard Cite

The mental model theory is an approach with clear psychological, linguistic, and cognitive consequences. This paper delves into some of the epistemological conclusions that can be drawn from it. In particular, it addresses the process why knowledge acquisition can modify the inferences people tend to make. That process is described by means of an example based on a well-known logical schema related to the conditional: Modus Tollendo Tollens.

show abstract

Detección de modelos mentales como posibilidades semánticas para el análisis del pensamiento social

Abstract: Detección de modelos mentales como posibilidades semánticas para el análisis del pensamiento social Detection of mental models as semantic possibilities for the analysis of social thought

Cited by 2 publications

References 11 publications

Stoic Logic Allows Understanding a Priori Falsity in the Conditional

Stoic Logic Allows Understanding a Priori Falsity in the Conditional

Formal inferences and their relationships to knowledge acquisition: mental models and semantic links

Contact Info

Product

Resources

About