2012
DOI: 10.1016/j.atmosenv.2012.07.071
|View full text |Cite
|
Sign up to set email alerts
|

Detailed predictions of particle aspiration affected by respiratory inhalation and airflow

Help me understand this report

Search citation statements

Order By: Relevance

Paper Sections

Select...
3
1
1

Citation Types

0
40
0
2

Year Published

2013
2013
2023
2023

Publication Types

Select...
6
3

Relationship

1
8

Authors

Journals

citations
Cited by 70 publications
(42 citation statements)
references
References 29 publications
0
40
0
2
Order By: Relevance
“…Due to the large mass of pathogens carried in these type of new airborne droplets/nuclei, the possibility of infection can be significantly increased. Similarly, some small airborne droplets could further shrink in size, becoming smaller than 10 μm and increasing the probability of lower respiratory tracts infections [5]. Fig.…”
Section: Analysis Of Inhalable Pathogenmentioning
confidence: 99%
See 1 more Smart Citation
“…Due to the large mass of pathogens carried in these type of new airborne droplets/nuclei, the possibility of infection can be significantly increased. Similarly, some small airborne droplets could further shrink in size, becoming smaller than 10 μm and increasing the probability of lower respiratory tracts infections [5]. Fig.…”
Section: Analysis Of Inhalable Pathogenmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…For airborne droplets, their movement could be dominated by the inertial and gravitational effects or the airflow, depending on the droplet size and air velocity [4]. In addition, studies on particle deposition in human airways [5] have proven that particles larger than 10 μm tend to impact onto the surface of upper airways while those smaller than 10 μm are more likely to penetrate deeper into the lower airways and pulmonary region. Some investigators [2,3] hence recommended 10 μm as a cut-off diameter to delineate upper and lower respiratory tract infections.…”
Section: Introductionmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…There still exist uncertainties concerning the appropriateness of such simplifications because features outside of the nose have a significant effect on airflows and particle behaviors within it (Doorly et al, 2008). A number of numerical studies have considered the external face in estimating particle inhalability in humanoid models (Anthony, 2010;Anthony & Anderson, 2013;Inthavong et al, 2012Inthavong et al, , 2013Li et al, 2012;Se et al, 2010). However, even larger numbers of numerical studies have excluded the facial interface (Liu et al, 2007;Martonen et al, 2003;Schroeter et al, 2001;Shi et al, 2006;Xi & Longest, 2009;Xi et al, 2011;Yu et al, 1998;Zamankhan et al, 2006), partially due to the complexity in developing computational models and the excessive computational expense incurred.…”
Section: Introductionmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…Figure 1 shows the reconstructed nasal model, which was truncated at the anterior trachea to focus on particle deposition in the nasal passage. To include realistic flow conditions at the vicinity of the nostril inlets, external facial features, and the surrounding breathing zone near the face were included (Doorly et al, 2008;King Se et al, 2010;Inthavong et al, 2012Inthavong et al, , 2013Ge et al, 2013).…”
Section: Methodsmentioning
confidence: 99%