2015
DOI: 10.1371/journal.pone.0116484
|View full text |Cite
|
Sign up to set email alerts
|

Detailed Phenotypic and Molecular Analyses of Genetically Modified Mice Generated by CRISPR-Cas9-Mediated Editing

Abstract: The bacterial CRISPR-Cas9 system has been adapted for use as a genome editing tool. While several recent reports have indicated that successful genome editing of mice can be achieved, detailed phenotypic and molecular analyses of the mutant animals are limited. Following pronuclear micro-injection of fertilized eggs with either wild-type Cas9 or the nickase mutant (D10A) and single or paired guide RNA (sgRNA) for targeting of the tyrosinase (Tyr) gene, we assessed genome editing in mice using rapid phenotypic … Show more

Help me understand this report

Search citation statements

Order By: Relevance

Paper Sections

Select...
1
1
1
1

Citation Types

3
37
0

Year Published

2015
2015
2024
2024

Publication Types

Select...
9
1

Relationship

1
9

Authors

Journals

citations
Cited by 49 publications
(40 citation statements)
references
References 52 publications
3
37
0
Order By: Relevance
“…LysMD3 gene trap mutant mice were genotyped using primers listed in Table 1, with GT mutant alleles identified by primers A+C and WT alleles identified by primers B+C. To generate CRISPR/Cas9 modified mLysMD3-deficient mice, B6 embryos were microinjected with mLysMD3 EN gRNA 1 and 2 (Table 1) and Cas9 mRNA and transferred to pseudopregnant recipient female mice, as previously described (54). Mice were screened for loss of exon 2 by Southern blot and targeted alleles verified by Sanger sequencing.…”
Section: Micementioning
confidence: 99%
“…LysMD3 gene trap mutant mice were genotyped using primers listed in Table 1, with GT mutant alleles identified by primers A+C and WT alleles identified by primers B+C. To generate CRISPR/Cas9 modified mLysMD3-deficient mice, B6 embryos were microinjected with mLysMD3 EN gRNA 1 and 2 (Table 1) and Cas9 mRNA and transferred to pseudopregnant recipient female mice, as previously described (54). Mice were screened for loss of exon 2 by Southern blot and targeted alleles verified by Sanger sequencing.…”
Section: Micementioning
confidence: 99%
“…Note that this approach will not detect very large deletions. 137 However, indels in the range of 35–100 nucleotides can easily be resolved in a 2% agarose gel (Supplemental Figure VIIa–VIIb). The PCR products may then be excised from the gel, column purified (Qiagen), and cloned directly into a plasmid (TOPO PCR cloning kit) for Sanger sequence analysis.…”
Section: Genotyping Of Crispr Micementioning
confidence: 99%
“…During gene editing, NHEJ is usually considered to lead to small indels at DSB sites. However, with appropriate experimental design, long deletions and other events can be detected in cultured cells and in both mouse and pig zygotes [5][6][7] . In Ma et al, genotyping involved amplification of a ~534 bp fragment in which the MYBPC3 ΔGAGT mutation is ~200 bp from a primer-binding site.…”
mentioning
confidence: 99%