2010
DOI: 10.1016/j.fishres.2010.06.016
|View full text |Cite
|
Sign up to set email alerts
|

Detailed mapping of fishing effort and landings by coupling fishing logbooks with satellite-recorded vessel geo-location

Help me understand this report

Search citation statements

Order By: Relevance

Paper Sections

Select...
1
1
1
1

Citation Types

0
112
0

Year Published

2012
2012
2023
2023

Publication Types

Select...
6
2

Relationship

0
8

Authors

Journals

citations
Cited by 124 publications
(112 citation statements)
references
References 17 publications
0
112
0
Order By: Relevance
“…7). However, fishing activity in the control area was low, which may have prevented us from detecting a potential MPA-effect (see Bastardie et al 2010 for details on the use of VMS data). Another expla nation for this may be that the home range of sand eels in the present study area is considerably larger than the size of Horns Rev I plus control area, and sandeels therefore freely move between the impact area and the control area (Kramer & Chapman 1999, Engelhard et al 2008.…”
Section: Discussionmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…7). However, fishing activity in the control area was low, which may have prevented us from detecting a potential MPA-effect (see Bastardie et al 2010 for details on the use of VMS data). Another expla nation for this may be that the home range of sand eels in the present study area is considerably larger than the size of Horns Rev I plus control area, and sandeels therefore freely move between the impact area and the control area (Kramer & Chapman 1999, Engelhard et al 2008.…”
Section: Discussionmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…Logbook information was merged with vessel details including number of fishers on board, vessel, and fishing gear type, and the physical characteristics of vessels (length, engine size, main gear, fish landing site). All activities by the vessel during fishing were captured including zero catch dates and non-fishing days (e.g., Bastardie et al, 2010). Results, including mean and standard errors, are presented for all vessels.…”
Section: Characterizing Fishing Activity Via Fishers Log Booksmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…However, these methods are not spatially explicit, nor do they differentiate between migrant and local fishers. A spatially explicit assessment of fisher resource use patterns requires high resolution and reliable information about spatial and temporal patterns and allocation of fishing effort for informed decision-making (Bastardie et al, 2010;Campbell et al, 2014;Pet-Soede et al, 2001). In addition, research methods typically employed for studying artisanal fisheries are often criticized for distortions related to recall, reliability, reproducibility, behavioral change, and privacy issues, especially when used in isolation (Gonzalez, Hidalgo, & Barabasi, 2008;Malleret-King, Glass, Wanyonyi, & Pomeroy, 2006;Ron, Muhando, & Francis, 1998;Stone & Shiffman, 2002).…”
Section: Novelty Of This Approachmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…In general, the spatial aggregation of socio-economic data in a GIS framework is difficult, involving close collaboration with the respective sectors (Ban et al 2013). Most progress can be found with regard to the mapping of fleet-specific fisheries activities due to technical advances in combining Vessel Monitoring System (VMS) and logbook information (Bastardie et al 2010;Lee et al 2010;Hintzen et al 2012). Finally, GIS-based DSS should be flexible enough to respond to shifting circumstances, such as changes in environmental conditions, environmental targets, growth expectations in the aquaculture sector, or policy environments.…”
Section: Conclusion and Future Needsmentioning
confidence: 99%