2010
DOI: 10.1088/0004-637x/713/1/552
|View full text |Cite
|
Sign up to set email alerts
|

DETAILED CLASSIFICATION OFSWIFT'S GAMMA-RAY BURSTS

Help me understand this report
View preprint versions

Search citation statements

Order By: Relevance

Paper Sections

Select...
3
1
1

Citation Types

16
110
0

Year Published

2010
2010
2018
2018

Publication Types

Select...
7
2

Relationship

2
7

Authors

Journals

citations
Cited by 90 publications
(126 citation statements)
references
References 38 publications
16
110
0
Order By: Relevance
“…Horváth (1998) and Mukherjee et al (1998) independently discovered a third peak in the duration distribution in the BATSE 3B catalog (Meegan et al 1996), located between the short and long peaks, and the statistical existence of this intermediate class was supported (Horváth 2002) with the use of BATSE 4B data. Evidence for a third component in log T 90 was also found in the Swift data (Horváth et al 2008a,b;Zhang & Choi 2008;Huja et al 2009;Horváth et al 2010). Other datasets, i.e., RHESSI (Řípa et al 2009) and BeppoSAX (Horváth 2009), are both in agreement with earlier results regarding the bimodal distribution, and the detection of a third component was established on a lower significance level (compared to BATSE and Swift) owing to less populated samples.…”
Section: Introductionsupporting
confidence: 83%
“…Horváth (1998) and Mukherjee et al (1998) independently discovered a third peak in the duration distribution in the BATSE 3B catalog (Meegan et al 1996), located between the short and long peaks, and the statistical existence of this intermediate class was supported (Horváth 2002) with the use of BATSE 4B data. Evidence for a third component in log T 90 was also found in the Swift data (Horváth et al 2008a,b;Zhang & Choi 2008;Huja et al 2009;Horváth et al 2010). Other datasets, i.e., RHESSI (Řípa et al 2009) and BeppoSAX (Horváth 2009), are both in agreement with earlier results regarding the bimodal distribution, and the detection of a third component was established on a lower significance level (compared to BATSE and Swift) owing to less populated samples.…”
Section: Introductionsupporting
confidence: 83%
“…This was confirmed from further analysis of the complete BATSE dataset (Horváth 2002;Chattopadhyay et al 2007;Zitouni et al 2015). Evidence for a third lognormal component was also found in Swift/BAT data (Horváth et al 2008;Huja et al 2009;Horváth et al 2010) using duration and also from two-dimensional clustering using both duration and hardness (Veres et al 2010 Horváth & Tóth (2016), who pointed that three lognormal distributions provide a better fit to the data than two with 99.9999% confidence level. Tarnopolski (2016a) finds that for the similar Swift GRB dataset consisting of 947 GRBs, three groups are favored in the observer frame, whereas two in the rest frame.…”
Section: Introductionsupporting
confidence: 62%
“…A solution, proposed to deal with the classification ambiguity problem, was proposed and examined in a number of papers (Hakkila et al 2003;Horváth et al 2004Horváth et al , 2006Horváth et al , 2010Chattopadhyay et al 2007;Veres et al 2010). The idea is to examine a multi-dimensional space of various parameters; particularly, a two-dimensional space of the hardness ratio vs. duration T 90 .…”
Section: Discussionmentioning
confidence: 99%