2005
DOI: 10.1016/j.bbr.2004.11.006
|View full text |Cite
|
Sign up to set email alerts
|

Detailed analysis of the behavior of Lister and Wistar rats in anxiety, object recognition and object location tasks

Help me understand this report

Search citation statements

Order By: Relevance

Paper Sections

Select...
2
1
1
1

Citation Types

4
105
1
3

Year Published

2006
2006
2023
2023

Publication Types

Select...
8
2

Relationship

0
10

Authors

Journals

citations
Cited by 178 publications
(113 citation statements)
references
References 64 publications
4
105
1
3
Order By: Relevance
“…The mice failed to discriminate between the objects in the familiar and novel location 24 h later, precluding the assessment of SD effects. This incapacity is consistent with data showing that C57BL/6 mice and several rat strains (DA, Sprague-Dawley and Lister) tested in the object location task successfully discriminated between the familiar and novel object location after a delay interval of up to 6 h, while others (DBA/2 mice and Wistar rats) did not (Dix & Aggleton, 1999;Ennaceur, Michalikova, Bradford, & Ahmed, 2005;Hotte, Naudon, & Jay, 2005;Lee, Hunsaker, & Kesner, 2005;Roullet, Mele, & Ammassari-Teule, 1997). This failure in discrimination between the familiar and novel location of the objects can be related to either impaired memory for the object per se or inability to use spatial information after the relatively long delay of 24 h.…”
Section: Discussionsupporting
confidence: 89%
“…The mice failed to discriminate between the objects in the familiar and novel location 24 h later, precluding the assessment of SD effects. This incapacity is consistent with data showing that C57BL/6 mice and several rat strains (DA, Sprague-Dawley and Lister) tested in the object location task successfully discriminated between the familiar and novel object location after a delay interval of up to 6 h, while others (DBA/2 mice and Wistar rats) did not (Dix & Aggleton, 1999;Ennaceur, Michalikova, Bradford, & Ahmed, 2005;Hotte, Naudon, & Jay, 2005;Lee, Hunsaker, & Kesner, 2005;Roullet, Mele, & Ammassari-Teule, 1997). This failure in discrimination between the familiar and novel location of the objects can be related to either impaired memory for the object per se or inability to use spatial information after the relatively long delay of 24 h.…”
Section: Discussionsupporting
confidence: 89%
“…However, the OR and OP tasks do not use a training paradigm, and as such traditional 'learning' does not occur (Ennaceur et al, 2005), which should eliminate possible confounds of behavioral experience between the two cohorts. As such, we believe that the differences in BDNF found between NP and MP females in the CA1 are in greater part due to parity, and not behavior experience.…”
Section: Multiparity Significantly Elevated Bdnf Concentration In Ca1mentioning
confidence: 99%
“…More specifically, we tested: (1) general anxiety behavior in an Elevated Plus Maze (EPM, Rodgers and Dalvi, 1997); (2) reward-based decision making in a rodent version of the Iowa Gambling Task (rIGT; Van den Bos et al, 2014) (3) non-stressful contextual learning in an object recognition task (ORT, Bevins and Besheer, 2006) and an object-in-location task (OLT, adapted from Ennaceur et al, 2005). Hippocampal structural measures included dentate gyrus (DG) volume, proliferation and neurogenesis that can be altered by (early life) stress and are involved in aspects of cognition (Lucassen et al, , 2013Oomen et al, 2011Oomen et al, , 2014.…”
Section: Introductionmentioning
confidence: 99%