2021
DOI: 10.3390/rs13061095
|View full text |Cite
|
Sign up to set email alerts
|

Destructive M6.2 Petrinja Earthquake (Croatia) in 2020—Preliminary Multidisciplinary Research

Abstract: On 28 December 2020, seismic activity in the wider Petrinja area strongly intensified after a period of relative seismological quiescence that had lasted more than 100 years (since the well-known M5.8 Kupa Valley earthquake of 1909, which is known based on the discovery of the Mohorovičić discontinuity). The day after the M5 foreshock, a destructive M6.2 mainshock occurred. Outcomes of preliminary seismological, geological and SAR image analyses indicate that the foreshocks, mainshock and aftershocks were gene… Show more

Help me understand this report

Search citation statements

Order By: Relevance

Paper Sections

Select...
3
1
1

Citation Types

2
51
3
3

Year Published

2021
2021
2022
2022

Publication Types

Select...
8
1

Relationship

3
6

Authors

Journals

citations
Cited by 57 publications
(61 citation statements)
references
References 42 publications
(57 reference statements)
2
51
3
3
Order By: Relevance
“…Kupa valley earthquake was the strongest earthquake on the Pannonian basin area that occurred before the Petrinja 2020 event. Its epicenter was located 9 km North of Pokupsko with magnitude of M w 5.8, and the hypocentral depth of 14 km [54]. The estimated intensity was VIII• MCS.…”
Section: Geodynamic Frameworkmentioning
confidence: 97%
“…Kupa valley earthquake was the strongest earthquake on the Pannonian basin area that occurred before the Petrinja 2020 event. Its epicenter was located 9 km North of Pokupsko with magnitude of M w 5.8, and the hypocentral depth of 14 km [54]. The estimated intensity was VIII• MCS.…”
Section: Geodynamic Frameworkmentioning
confidence: 97%
“…SAR images have a large spatial coverage, a high spatio-temporal resolution, and data from few sensors can be freely accessed like for Sentinel-1 SAR [11]. In the past three decades, conventional InSAR (Interferometric SAR) and time series InSAR (TSInSAR) techniques have been successfully applied to land subsidence monitoring [12][13][14][15][16][17]. TSInSAR is particularly well established in monitoring post-hazard surface deformation patterns [14], but it is only partially developed for observing small spatial scale hazards such as sinkholes [2,18,19].…”
Section: Introductionmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…In the past three decades, conventional InSAR (Interferometric SAR) and time series InSAR (TSInSAR) techniques have been successfully applied to land subsidence monitoring [12][13][14][15][16][17]. TSInSAR is particularly well established in monitoring post-hazard surface deformation patterns [14], but it is only partially developed for observing small spatial scale hazards such as sinkholes [2,18,19]. Moreover, there is a lack of generic methods to detect sinkholes, although attempts have been made to model TSInSAR derived deformations as Gaussian shaped sinkholes [20].…”
Section: Introductionmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…The emergence of spatial chaos can be evolutionary, and created over time, for example due to poor-quality laws or the lack of their proper enforcement [118]. Spatial chaos can occur suddenly due to violent and destructive natural phenomena, such as earthquakes and accompanying tsunamis [119,120], floods, or hurricanes [121]. More often, however, it is the result of phenomena such as a severe economic and social crisis or an armed conflict [122,123].…”
Section: Discussionmentioning
confidence: 99%