2020
DOI: 10.1088/1741-4326/abb123
|View full text |Cite
|
Sign up to set email alerts
|

Destabilization of Alfvénic activity by non-axisymmetric magnetic field induced rotation braking in KSTAR tokamak

Abstract: We report an experimental observation of destabilization of the Alfvénic activity by non-axisymmetric (3D) magnetic field induced toroidal rotation braking in the KSTAR tokamak. The toroidicity-induced Alfvén eigenmodes (TAEs) are destabilized when toroidal plasma rotation is reduced down to the minimum to approach near-zero rotational shear by 3D magnetic braking. This observation indicates that the stability of the TAEs is strongly correlated to the plasma rotation that modifies Alfvén continuum. The TAE fre… Show more

Help me understand this report

Search citation statements

Order By: Relevance

Paper Sections

Select...
4
1

Citation Types

3
12
0

Year Published

2021
2021
2022
2022

Publication Types

Select...
5

Relationship

1
4

Authors

Journals

citations
Cited by 9 publications
(15 citation statements)
references
References 37 publications
(43 reference statements)
3
12
0
Order By: Relevance
“…Considering that the physics of RMPs is still far from being fully understood, the most important question however remains at what conditions ELMs are suppressed in present day machines and will they be suppressed in ITER scenarios? Recent modelling results of RMP experiments in ASDEX-Upgrade [26] and KSTAR [31] validated many aspects of the RMPs and ELMs physics models implemented in the nonlinear resistive MHD JOREK code that we also used to model ELM suppression in ITER in this paper. It was demonstrated previously [19,26,31] that the non-linear multi-harmonics MHD approach, including a realistic tokamak geometry with the X-point and the scrape-off-layer (SOL), realistic geometry and spectrum of RMP coils, toroidal rotation, bi-fluid diamagnetic effects and neoclassical poloidal friction represent a minimum model which permits to reproduce experimental results of ELM suppression in modelling.…”
Section: Introductionsupporting
confidence: 61%
See 4 more Smart Citations
“…Considering that the physics of RMPs is still far from being fully understood, the most important question however remains at what conditions ELMs are suppressed in present day machines and will they be suppressed in ITER scenarios? Recent modelling results of RMP experiments in ASDEX-Upgrade [26] and KSTAR [31] validated many aspects of the RMPs and ELMs physics models implemented in the nonlinear resistive MHD JOREK code that we also used to model ELM suppression in ITER in this paper. It was demonstrated previously [19,26,31] that the non-linear multi-harmonics MHD approach, including a realistic tokamak geometry with the X-point and the scrape-off-layer (SOL), realistic geometry and spectrum of RMP coils, toroidal rotation, bi-fluid diamagnetic effects and neoclassical poloidal friction represent a minimum model which permits to reproduce experimental results of ELM suppression in modelling.…”
Section: Introductionsupporting
confidence: 61%
“…Recent modelling results of RMP experiments in ASDEX-Upgrade [26] and KSTAR [31] validated many aspects of the RMPs and ELMs physics models implemented in the nonlinear resistive MHD JOREK code that we also used to model ELM suppression in ITER in this paper. It was demonstrated previously [19,26,31] that the non-linear multi-harmonics MHD approach, including a realistic tokamak geometry with the X-point and the scrape-off-layer (SOL), realistic geometry and spectrum of RMP coils, toroidal rotation, bi-fluid diamagnetic effects and neoclassical poloidal friction represent a minimum model which permits to reproduce experimental results of ELM suppression in modelling. As it was shown in [19,26,31] RMPs drive non-linearly coupled side harmonics k × N locked to the static RMP with main toroidal number N in the ELM suppression stage while strongly mitigating other harmonics responsible for ELM crash.…”
Section: Introductionsupporting
confidence: 61%
See 3 more Smart Citations