1999
DOI: 10.1016/s0927-5371(98)00018-9
|View full text |Cite
|
Sign up to set email alerts
|

Desired and actual labour supply of unmarried men and women in the Netherlands

Abstract: and it is a condition of accessing publications that users recognise and abide by the legal requirements associated with these rights.-Users may download and print one copy of any publication from the public portal for the purpose of private study or research-You may not further distribute the material or use it for any profit-making activity or commercial gain-You may freely distribute the URL identifying the publication in the public portal Take down policy If you believe that this document breaches copyrigh… Show more

Help me understand this report

Search citation statements

Order By: Relevance

Paper Sections

Select...
2
1
1

Citation Types

3
67
0

Year Published

2005
2005
2015
2015

Publication Types

Select...
8
1

Relationship

1
8

Authors

Journals

citations
Cited by 100 publications
(74 citation statements)
references
References 12 publications
3
67
0
Order By: Relevance
“…For example, workers may face restrictions on hours and days worked by employers (e.g. Ilmakunnas and Pudney, 1990;Dickens and Lundberg, 1993;Stewart and Swaffield, 1997;Euwals and van Soest, 1999;for Germany see e.g. Holst and Schupp, 1998;Wolf, 1998).…”
Section: Resultsmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…For example, workers may face restrictions on hours and days worked by employers (e.g. Ilmakunnas and Pudney, 1990;Dickens and Lundberg, 1993;Stewart and Swaffield, 1997;Euwals and van Soest, 1999;for Germany see e.g. Holst and Schupp, 1998;Wolf, 1998).…”
Section: Resultsmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…Moreover, the restrictions in the Hausman model do not need to be imposed. Studies that use this approach are, amongst others, van Soest (1995); Euwals and van Soest (1999); Euwals (2001); Bonin et al (2002) and Bargain (2005).…”
Section: The Empirical Literature On Labour Supply Elasticitiesmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…In addition, it should be noted that male labour supply elasticity becomes even more insignificant when we use robust standard errors. However, the research literature typically reports larger values of the predicted elasticity for women than for men (see, for example, Blau & Kahn, 2005;Bonin, Kempe, & Schneider, 2002;Bourguignon & Magnac, 1990;Devereux, 2003;Eissa & Hoynes, 2004;Euwals & van Soest, 1999;Hausman, 1981;Hausman & Ruud, 1984).…”
Section: Resultsmentioning
confidence: 99%