2015
DOI: 10.1007/978-3-319-20916-6_3
|View full text |Cite
|
Sign up to set email alerts
|

Designing Touchless Gestural Interactions for Public Displays In-the-Wild

Abstract: Public displays, typically equipped with touchscreens, are used for interactions in public spaces, such as streets or fairs. Currently low-cost visual sensing technologies, such as Kinect-like devices and high quality cameras, allow to easily implement touchless interfaces. Nevertheless, the arising interactions have not yet been fully investigated for public displays in-the-wild (i.e. in appropriate social contexts where public displays are typically deployed). Different audiences, cultures and social setting… Show more

Help me understand this report

Search citation statements

Order By: Relevance

Paper Sections

Select...
2
2
1

Citation Types

0
12
0

Year Published

2016
2016
2020
2020

Publication Types

Select...
2
2
2

Relationship

5
1

Authors

Journals

citations
Cited by 13 publications
(12 citation statements)
references
References 26 publications
0
12
0
Order By: Relevance
“…In the last twenty years, gesture recognition has been the subject of several researches in the field of pattern recognition and has found many applications in robotics [11] and human-computer interaction [12]. Moreover, the availability of novel technologies has significantly contributed to the growing interest towards the development of gesture recognition algorithms.…”
Section: Related Workmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…In the last twenty years, gesture recognition has been the subject of several researches in the field of pattern recognition and has found many applications in robotics [11] and human-computer interaction [12]. Moreover, the availability of novel technologies has significantly contributed to the growing interest towards the development of gesture recognition algorithms.…”
Section: Related Workmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…We modeled this scenario as a gesture elicitation study, which requires the acquisition and the editing of a new gesture data set.…”
Section: Kind‐dama In Actionmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…Allowing information visualization with no constraints related to touch reachability, still keeping systems interactive Limiting vandalism in public deployment, as a direct consequence of the previous one. Simplifying and encouraging multiple parallel interactions, mainly due to the higher allowed interaction distance . In fact, the interaction distance impacts the available space in front of the interactive system: the higher the interaction distance, the more room for multiple users. …”
Section: Introductionmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…First of all, experimenters must take into account all the influencing factors of a public place. The best results may be achieved conducting the study in-the-wild [10], although this increase costs and efforts in terms of time and set up challenges. Furthermore, researchers must take into account issues like the need of overcoming the display blindness [4] andprobably more complicated -the interaction blindness [3].…”
Section: Related Workmentioning
confidence: 99%