2007
DOI: 10.4135/9781849208826
|View full text |Cite
|
Sign up to set email alerts
|

Designing Qualitative Research

Help me understand this report

Search citation statements

Order By: Relevance

Paper Sections

Select...
2
1
1
1

Citation Types

2
356
0
43

Year Published

2010
2010
2022
2022

Publication Types

Select...
8
2

Relationship

0
10

Authors

Journals

citations
Cited by 523 publications
(436 citation statements)
references
References 0 publications
2
356
0
43
Order By: Relevance
“…There is increased focus on how quality can be ensured when working with qualitative sets of data (Tracy, 2010), mainly by implementing rigour and transparency of the approach used (Flick, 2007). All interviews, focus groups and case study visits were tape recorded with the participants" consent, translated into English when necessary, transcribed and analysed using a grid analysis approach and thematic coding (Boyatzis, 1988).…”
Section: Discussionmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…There is increased focus on how quality can be ensured when working with qualitative sets of data (Tracy, 2010), mainly by implementing rigour and transparency of the approach used (Flick, 2007). All interviews, focus groups and case study visits were tape recorded with the participants" consent, translated into English when necessary, transcribed and analysed using a grid analysis approach and thematic coding (Boyatzis, 1988).…”
Section: Discussionmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…These categories were inductively derived from focused interviews in a study conducted prior to this one, in which one interviewer conducted nine in-depth semi-structured qualitative interviews (cf. Flick 2007), which comprised four open-ended questions regarding (1) things that add to and (2) diminish overall quality of life, (3) how participants would define in their own terms ''quality of life, '' and (4) what was the most important thing in their life. Two coders were trained and achieved very good inter-coder reliability in sample texts prior to Study 1 (determined as coefficient M = .95; cf.…”
Section: Analysesmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…In the fourth and final stage each participant wrote an individual, reflective summary statement of the findings collated throughout the process. This final stage of the research process utilised a form of discourse analysis (Flick 2007) where the findings of the final summaries were analysed by each researcher separately whilst triangulating with earlier data to allow for the different researcher perspectives and assist with respondent validation (Gibbs 2007). These results were then brought together by all three researchers, analysed for presentation in this paper with discussion illustrated with example quotes from the written (initial and final) reflections.…”
Section: Methodsmentioning
confidence: 99%