Abstract:Now, more than ever, higher education faces the challenge of educating students to see beyond the limits of their own discipline and to come up with innovative integrated solutions to our contemporary problems. Designing Interdisciplinary Education serves as a foothold for interdisciplinary initiatives in higher education, whether it be programmes, minors, courses or extra-curricular activities. It offers accessible guidance and practical advice for university teachers and curriculum leaders who aim to develop… Show more
“…Thus, interdisciplinarity allows for a deeper understanding of the contents being studied, since different disciplines are interconnected [21]. However, in addition to the gains in terms of articulation, we share the view of some scholars [22], who believe that interdisciplinary tasks contribute to the increase of disciplinespecific knowledge, promoting critical thinking and creativity in both teachers and students [11].…”
“…Thus, interdisciplinarity allows for a deeper understanding of the contents being studied, since different disciplines are interconnected [21]. However, in addition to the gains in terms of articulation, we share the view of some scholars [22], who believe that interdisciplinary tasks contribute to the increase of disciplinespecific knowledge, promoting critical thinking and creativity in both teachers and students [11].…”
“…The participants attributed the reasons for their positive views on interdisciplinary activities to the fact that they enable meaningful learning, are associated with daily life, are more beneficial to themselves, and are effective. As de Greef et al (2017) underlined in the literature, the interdisciplinary approach enables students to see things from a broad perspective, while in the study by Repko et al (2016), it is stated that this approach method also helps students to relate the real world to their own education. In the context of higher education, this approach will contribute positively to the formation of creative environments and to the creation of a wide range of collective fields of study, as well as to innovative thinking skills (Gardiner, 2020).…”
In the present study it is aimed to investigate the pre-service science and mathematics teachers’ opinions on the effect of technology-supported interdisciplinary activities on critical thinking and creativity. This study was designed as a case study, a qualitative research method. A total of 17 pre-service teachers were selected for the current study. Four questions were included in the survey to gauge pre-service teachers' opinions on the impact of technology-supported interdisciplinary integration on critical thinking and creativity. Research was undertaken to gather information from the relevant literature while formulating the questions. Due to the pandemic, the technology-supported interdisciplinary science and mathematics integration course was delivered via remote education. This research was carried out throughout the academic year 2020-2021. The data collection method was used as an online form for the participants. The online technology-supported interdisciplinary course application was completed during 25 hours of instruction. TUBITAK financed this course in the 2021/1 term under the project code 1129B372100437 as part of the 2237-A program. Content analysis was used to examine the data gathered from the open-ended question form. It was concluded that the pre-service teachers participating in the study generally had positive views about technology-supported interdisciplinary activities. Participants stated that in the student context, the activities increased students’ interest in the lesson, enabled a holistic perspective, provided solutions to real-life problems, and improved their thinking skills. The responses received from the participants indicate that these activities have a positive effect on critical thinking skills in the context of both the student and the teacher
“…Design education becomes the only viable tool for new approaches to be acknowledged, analyzed, understood, tested and validated and for the aforementioned differences to be taken into account. Interdisciplinary, experiential, interactive and intercultural training paths that prepare to face the complexity of contemporaneity (American Institute of Graphic Artists 2017; De Greef et al 2017;Klaassen 2018;Self et al 2019) have been taken as a preferential strategy to learn the design process and to place the product, message or service in real and dynamic scenarios. As Gosling (2017) writes in a commentary on AIGA's Design 2025 report: 'design students of the present and future need to be able to […] evaluate their work in terms of its potential social, cultural, technological, economic and environmental impact.…”
In recent years, co-creation and collaboration platforms to create and deliver new products and services have taken a step forward; this has led to the development of a new active involvement of users, who from co-designers have become independent designers, even if not experts. Co-design is dynamic and provides the tools to generate democratic design processes guided by the users themselves. The democratization of design tools is the premise for a new paradigm defined ‘Diffuse Design’ by Manzini (2015). This contribution explores the approaches of open design and open production with particular attention to the field of visual communication and the production of motion design artifacts. After an introduction to the co-design framework, the main open-production visual communication platforms are presented to offer an overview of the topic. Next, the potential of online platforms to enable non-designers to produce animated artifacts is explored by examining student projects in a motion design University course. The most significant outputs of the student experience are then described and critically analyzed. Finally, the conclusions investigate the different perspectives for reading the democratization of tools for creating visual artifacts and lay the foundations for future lines of research.
scite is a Brooklyn-based organization that helps researchers better discover and understand research articles through Smart Citations–citations that display the context of the citation and describe whether the article provides supporting or contrasting evidence. scite is used by students and researchers from around the world and is funded in part by the National Science Foundation and the National Institute on Drug Abuse of the National Institutes of Health.