Designing for collaborative interpretation in telemonitoring: Re-introducing patients as diagnostic agents

Andersen, Tariq Osman; Bjørn, Pernille; Kensing, Finn; Moll, Jonas

doi:10.1016/j.ijmedinf.2010.09.010

Cited by 90 publications

(60 citation statements)

References 27 publications

Supporting

Mentioning

Contrasting

Order By: Relevance

“…It seems that healthcare IT projects, while driven by methodological approaches that in their very essence build on models that value an active participation of different stakeholders (i.e., patients), are stuck with authoritative de-contextualized models concerning the relationship between doctor, patient, and treatment. Participatory design driven healthcare IT projects do exist that have investigated alternative strategies for care, including a renegotiated patient-physician relation and collaboration [1]. Nevertheless, with only few recent exceptions (e.g.…”

Section: Participation In Design: Participatory Design In Healthcarementioning

confidence: 99%

Concordance: A Critical Participatory Alternative in Healthcare IT

Grönvall

Verdezoto

Bagalkot

et al. 2015

AAHCC

View full text Add to dashboard Cite

The healthcare sector is undergoing large changes in which technology is given a more active role in both in-clinic and out-of-clinic care. Authoritative healthcare models such as compliance and adherence which relies on asymmetric patient-doctor relationships are being challenged as society, patient roles and care contexts transforms, for example when care activities move into non-clinical contexts.Concordance is an alternative model proposed by the medical field that favours an equal and collaborative patient-doctor relationship in the negotiation of care. Similarly, HCI researchers have applied diverse models of engagement in IT design ranging from authoritative models (e.g. perceiving people as human factors to design for) to more democratic design processes (e.g. Participatory Design). IT design has also been crafted as on-going processes that are integrated parts of everyday use. Based on the best practice of participation from the medical and the HCI fields, we identify critical alternatives for healthcare design. These alternatives highlight opportunities with ongoing design processes in which the design of care regimens and care IT are perceived as one process.

show abstract

Section: Participation In Design: Participatory Design In Healthcarementioning

confidence: 99%

Concordance: A Critical Participatory Alternative in Healthcare IT

Grönvall

Verdezoto

Bagalkot

et al. 2015

AAHCC

View full text Add to dashboard Cite

show abstract

“…Also, a range of healthcare solutions exists to support patients once at home, for example different tele-medicine and monitoring solutions [20,27,28]. Much of the previously reported on homecare design work within research have been rather technology-driven [13], demonstrating for example technological requirements and possibilities with tele-care and tele-monitoring [29].…”

Section: Related Workmentioning

confidence: 99%

“…The (re-)configuration of care challenges both the novel places for care and what it means to be a 'doctor' and 'patient' in such places [28,36]. Challenges previously reported on in home-based care include (but is not limited to) the acceptance of technology in peoples' homes [37], to find a physical place for the technology within the home [17] and how care technologies can be successfully integrated in everyday life [23], without creating unwanted dependencies or foster social isolation [38].…”

Section: Related Workmentioning

confidence: 99%

Managing Telehealth and Telecare

Turner

2014

Pervasive Health

View full text Add to dashboard Cite

“…This might include situations where medical doctors want to improve the practices of decision making (Frykholm and Groth 2011), or evaluate the implementation of a particular technology within a practice (Tang and Carpendale 2008;Zhou et al 2012). The technologies can be particular artefacts, such as electronic patient records (Hertzum and Simonsen 2008), or more complex systems, such as hospital information systems (Aarts et al 2007;Ellingsen et al 2013), document handling systems (Boulus and Bjørn 2008), electronic medical record systems (Johannesen et al 2013), or telemedicine technologies (Andersen et al 2010). Similar to technology-centred research, this type of research shares an interest in the organizational, economic, social, and clinical impact of information systems in healthcare; however, it is important to note that for studies within this particular research area the technical artefact is the main focus.…”

Section: Design Research In Healthcarementioning

confidence: 99%