2013
DOI: 10.1364/oe.21.028693
|View full text |Cite
|
Sign up to set email alerts
|

Designing double freeform optical surfaces for controlling both irradiance and wavefront

Abstract: We propose an improved double freeform-optical-surface design method for shaping a prescribed irradiance distribution whilst forming a desired wavefront from a given incident beam. This method generalizes our previous work [Opt. Exp. 21, 14728-14735 (2013)] to tackle non-separable beam irradiances. We firstly compute a proper ray mapping using an adaptive mesh method in the framework of the L2 Monge-Kantorovich mass transfer problem. Then, we construct the two freeform optical surfaces according to this mappin… Show more

Help me understand this report

Search citation statements

Order By: Relevance

Paper Sections

Select...
3
1
1

Citation Types

0
60
0

Year Published

2014
2014
2023
2023

Publication Types

Select...
7
1

Relationship

1
7

Authors

Journals

citations
Cited by 88 publications
(60 citation statements)
references
References 23 publications
0
60
0
Order By: Relevance
“…However, detailed design procedures have been reported mainly for collimated laser beam shaping with plane wavefronts. [15][16][17][18][19][20][21][22][23][24] There is work 25 which can be used to generate a freeform wavefront; however, the irradiance is defined in the case at a plane close to the wavefront rather than on the wavefront itself. In our case, we have defined both the irradiance and the phase at the same plane, so that the design has a good accuracy even when the beam is strongly focused.…”
Section: Step Ii: Lens Design By Ray Mapping From the Input Plane To mentioning
confidence: 99%
See 1 more Smart Citation
“…However, detailed design procedures have been reported mainly for collimated laser beam shaping with plane wavefronts. [15][16][17][18][19][20][21][22][23][24] There is work 25 which can be used to generate a freeform wavefront; however, the irradiance is defined in the case at a plane close to the wavefront rather than on the wavefront itself. In our case, we have defined both the irradiance and the phase at the same plane, so that the design has a good accuracy even when the beam is strongly focused.…”
Section: Step Ii: Lens Design By Ray Mapping From the Input Plane To mentioning
confidence: 99%
“…To evaluate the shaping quality, the difference between the actual irradiance and the expected one can be quantified by the relative root-mean-squared error (RRMSE) 25,28 E Q -T A R G E T ; t e m p : i n t r a l i n k -; e 0 2 7 ; 3 2 6 ; 4 2 1…”
Section: Sensitivity Analysis: the Added-phase-controlmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…Generally, the illumination design algorithms can be divided into two groups: zero-étendue algorithms [2][3][4][5][6][7][8][9] and algorithms for extended sources [10][11][12][13]. For a zero-étendue algorithm, the light source is assumed as an ideal source (a point source or a parallel beam), in which there is only one single ray passing through each point on the optical surface, as shown in Fig.…”
Section: Introductionmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…1(a). This simplistic assumption allows us to easily achieve a predefined deflection of the optical surface for each incident ray [6,9]. Since the étendue of an actual light source usually cannot be zero in practical applications, these zero-étendue algorithms are invalid in a compact design where the influence of the size or the angular extent of the extended source on the performance of an illumination system cannot be ignored.…”
Section: Introductionmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…Even so, the simultaneous control on both the intensity and phase profile is still a real challenge of laser beam shaping. There are several reports which have addressed this challenging issue [9][10][11][12][13] . Rubinstein employed a freeform lens integrated with two freeform surfaces to control the intensity and phase profile of laser beam [9] .…”
Section: Introductionmentioning
confidence: 99%