2017
DOI: 10.5547/01956574.38.3.dbro
|View full text |Cite
|
Sign up to set email alerts
|

Designing Compensation for Distributed Solar Generation: Is Net Metering Ever Optimal?

Abstract: summarizes the extent of distributed generation around the world. 3. See Weissman and Johnson (2012), for example. The potential disadvantages of DG include the fact that, because the amount of electricity produced by solar panels varies with the prevailing level of sunshine, backup generation resources and additional ancillary services may be required to maintain network reliability. Furthermore, electricity may not be produced during periods of peak demand, when the cost of centralized electricity production… Show more

Help me understand this report

Search citation statements

Order By: Relevance

Paper Sections

Select...
2
1
1
1

Citation Types

1
44
0

Year Published

2017
2017
2024
2024

Publication Types

Select...
6
1

Relationship

1
6

Authors

Journals

citations
Cited by 66 publications
(48 citation statements)
references
References 25 publications
1
44
0
Order By: Relevance
“…While the empirical strategy chosen is the same as in regression (1), different subsamples are considered. In regression (7) and (8), we split our sample in two parts, before and after the major change in legislation supporting PV investments that took place in early 2014. First, focusing on the time period when the Solwatt system was in place, we observe no major change compared to our previous results.…”
Section: Resultsmentioning
confidence: 99%
See 1 more Smart Citation
“…While the empirical strategy chosen is the same as in regression (1), different subsamples are considered. In regression (7) and (8), we split our sample in two parts, before and after the major change in legislation supporting PV investments that took place in early 2014. First, focusing on the time period when the Solwatt system was in place, we observe no major change compared to our previous results.…”
Section: Resultsmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…2). 7 On average, as of 2017, distribution tariffs make 37% of the resident's final electricity bill (CWaPE, 2017). The regulated distribution tariff covers the cost of the grid cost but not only.…”
Section: Distribution Tariffmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…Relevant literature regarding the modelling approach includes the work of Brown and Sappington (2017a, 2017b, 2018. In their papers, they apply a welfare analysis to gain insights into the issue of optimal retail tariffs in a setting where consumers with a certain elasticity are adopting distributed generation (DG).…”
Section: Literature and Reasoning Behind The Modelling Approachmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…Moreover, the benefits active consumers obtain could be at the expense of passive consumers. Brown and Sappington (2017a) estimate the welfare and distributional impact of a vertical utility not being allowed to recover its costs by raising fixed charges in addition to volumetric charges with net-metering. Indeed, they find that in a context with active consumers investing in solar PV, negative distributional and aggregate welfare effects can be more pronounced when the regulator is not allowed to raise fixed charges.…”
Section: Introductionmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…The interaction between distribution tariff structures and DER investment has been studied extensively. Many researchers focus on volumetric net-metering tariffs that incentivize investments in photovoltaics (PV) (Simshauser, 2016;Eid et al, 2014;Laws et al, 2017;Brown and Sappington, 2017). Simshauser (2016) finds that net-metering policies in Southeast Queensland in Australia have led to significant welfare transfers from non-solar to solar households, thus forming an "implicit subsidy" for PV.…”
Section: Introductionmentioning
confidence: 99%