Field and Laboratory Methods for Grassland and Animal Production Research 2000
DOI: 10.1079/9780851993515.0327
|View full text |Cite
|
Sign up to set email alerts
|

Designing animal production studies.

Abstract: The design and implementation of studies on animal (cattle, sheep and goats) production from both improved grasslands and rangelands is reviewed. Grazing system and stocking rate terminology, planning animal production studies, development of an appropriate experimental design, duration and start date of the experiment, and extension requirements are discussed.

Help me understand this report

Search citation statements

Order By: Relevance

Paper Sections

Select...
2
2

Citation Types

0
4
0

Year Published

2003
2003
2022
2022

Publication Types

Select...
3
1

Relationship

0
4

Authors

Journals

citations
Cited by 4 publications
(4 citation statements)
references
References 0 publications
0
4
0
Order By: Relevance
“…, 1987; Coates and Penning, 2000). According to Bransby and Maclaurin (2000), total heifer production ha −1 can be calculated as PH × SR × T, where PH is the daily production per heifer (kg), SR is the stocking rate (heifers ha −1 ) and T is the grazing time in days.…”
Section: Grazing Experimentsmentioning
confidence: 99%
See 1 more Smart Citation
“…, 1987; Coates and Penning, 2000). According to Bransby and Maclaurin (2000), total heifer production ha −1 can be calculated as PH × SR × T, where PH is the daily production per heifer (kg), SR is the stocking rate (heifers ha −1 ) and T is the grazing time in days.…”
Section: Grazing Experimentsmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…Moreover, the method used incorporates grazing time as a response variable as grazing was ended on different treatments or plots at different times, based on an objective criterion – canopy height. According to Bransby and Maclaurin (2000), this time factor is often completely overlooked in experiments measuring animal production.…”
Section: Grazing Experimentsmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…Lower stocking rates allow greater development of the animal, due to the higher forage accumulation, making it possible for females to have more food available [ 77 ]. Stocking rate is a primary management variable in grazing systems because it modulates the interactions between animals and pasture [ 78 , 79 ]. As stocking rate increases, herbage allowance decreases and can reach levels where intake per animal is too low for production, but intake per unit area surpasses the ability of pastures to produce and recover.…”
Section: Discussionmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…Lower stocking rates allow greater development of the animal, due to the higher forage accumulation, making it possible for females to have more food available (Euclides & Euclides Filho 1998). Stocking rate is a primary management variable in grazing systems because it modulates the interactions between animals and pasture (Bransby & Maclaurin 2000; Carvalho & Batello 2009). As stocking rate increases, herbage allowance decreases and can reach levels where intake per animal is too low for production, but intake per unit area surpasses the ability of pastures to produce and recover.…”
Section: Discussionmentioning
confidence: 99%