2021 IEEE/CVF International Conference on Computer Vision (ICCV) 2021
DOI: 10.1109/iccv48922.2021.00475
|View full text |Cite
|
Sign up to set email alerts
|

Designing a Practical Degradation Model for Deep Blind Image Super-Resolution

Help me understand this report

Search citation statements

Order By: Relevance

Paper Sections

Select...
2
1
1
1

Citation Types

0
163
0

Year Published

2022
2022
2023
2023

Publication Types

Select...
4
1
1

Relationship

1
5

Authors

Journals

citations
Cited by 259 publications
(163 citation statements)
references
References 50 publications
0
163
0
Order By: Relevance
“…We compare the proposed QuanTexSR with several state-of-the-art methods for blind SR, including CDC [45], DAN [29], DASR(W) [40], RealSR [17], BSRGAN [51], Real-ESRGAN+ [42] and SwinIR-GAN [26]. Specifically, CDC proposed a divide-and-conquer architecture; DAN, DASR(W) and RealSR learned degradation models from LR inputs; BSRGAN, Real-ESRGAN+ and SwinIR-GAN used synthetic training data generated by handcrafted degradation models.…”
Section: Comparison With Existing Methodsmentioning
confidence: 99%
See 4 more Smart Citations
“…We compare the proposed QuanTexSR with several state-of-the-art methods for blind SR, including CDC [45], DAN [29], DASR(W) [40], RealSR [17], BSRGAN [51], Real-ESRGAN+ [42] and SwinIR-GAN [26]. Specifically, CDC proposed a divide-and-conquer architecture; DAN, DASR(W) and RealSR learned degradation models from LR inputs; BSRGAN, Real-ESRGAN+ and SwinIR-GAN used synthetic training data generated by handcrafted degradation models.…”
Section: Comparison With Existing Methodsmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…Note that we focus on the LPIPS scores as it better captures the perceptual quality than other metrics (e.g. PSNR/SSIM) [41,42,48,51,54]. In addition, it can be observed that: in general, methods that learn the degradations, such as DAN and DASR(W), perform much worse than those using manually designed degradation models, which indicates the difficulties in learning complex real-world degradations.…”
Section: Comparison With Existing Methodsmentioning
confidence: 99%
See 3 more Smart Citations