18th International Conference on Advanced Information Networking and Applications, 2004. AINA 2004.
DOI: 10.1109/aina.2004.1283847
|View full text |Cite
|
Sign up to set email alerts
|

Designing a mobile phone of the future: Requirements elicitation using photo essays and scenarios

Abstract: We report a case study of designing a mobile phone of the future, involving participatory requirements elicitation using a form of scenario-based design. Participants took photographs and wrote essays that illustrate their personal interests and perspectives on given themes. They then analyzed the photos and essays. They created scenarios and posed questions about the scenarios to envision contexts of future use. The participants produced novel design concepts and provided design insights even though they had … Show more

Help me understand this report

Search citation statements

Order By: Relevance

Paper Sections

Select...
1

Citation Types

0
0
0

Publication Types

Select...
1
1

Relationship

0
2

Authors

Journals

citations
Cited by 2 publications
(1 citation statement)
references
References 14 publications
0
0
0
Order By: Relevance
“…Scenario-based elicitation techniques (Carroll, 2000, Go et al, 2004 extract knowledge from domain experts by engaging them in specific cases of how to use the system under development or in concrete manifestations of the problem under consideration. Scenarios, which have been extensively employed in software engineering (Weidenhaupt, 1998;Holbrook, 1990;Kavakli et al, 1996), can be used in combination with prototyping.…”
Section: Introductionmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…Scenario-based elicitation techniques (Carroll, 2000, Go et al, 2004 extract knowledge from domain experts by engaging them in specific cases of how to use the system under development or in concrete manifestations of the problem under consideration. Scenarios, which have been extensively employed in software engineering (Weidenhaupt, 1998;Holbrook, 1990;Kavakli et al, 1996), can be used in combination with prototyping.…”
Section: Introductionmentioning
confidence: 99%