AIAA Infotech @ Aerospace 2015
DOI: 10.2514/6.2015-1111
|View full text |Cite
|
Sign up to set email alerts
|

Designing a Human-Computer Cooperation Decision Planning System for Aircraft Carrier Deck Scheduling

Help me understand this report

Search citation statements

Order By: Relevance

Paper Sections

Select...
2
1
1
1

Citation Types

0
6
0

Year Published

2018
2018
2020
2020

Publication Types

Select...
6

Relationship

0
6

Authors

Journals

citations
Cited by 6 publications
(6 citation statements)
references
References 7 publications
0
6
0
Order By: Relevance
“…A series of parameters for the heuristics algorithms were determined experimentally through several tests. The population size and iterations had been tested in the previous literature [18]. In this paper, the population size was set as 50.…”
Section: Parameter Setting For the Heuristics Algorithmmentioning
confidence: 99%
See 1 more Smart Citation
“…A series of parameters for the heuristics algorithms were determined experimentally through several tests. The population size and iterations had been tested in the previous literature [18]. In this paper, the population size was set as 50.…”
Section: Parameter Setting For the Heuristics Algorithmmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…Michini [16] applied the reverse reinforcement learning method and Dastidar [17] presented the queuing network optimizing strategy for aircraft scheduling problems. Zhi Zhang [18] designed a human-computer cooperation decision planning system (aircraft carrier deck operation planner (ACDOP) system). Feng Qiang [19] proposed a multi-agent based fleet maintenance personnel configuration method to solve the mission-oriented aircraft fleet maintenance personnel configuration problem.…”
Section: Introductionmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…After the aircraft leaves the carrier, they execute specific missions in the air and will return to the carrier for the next cycle once the missions have been finished. It is obvious that the first and last stages of flight deck operations concern more about the 4 Complexity route planning problem, which has been intensively studied in [19,54]. This paper concentrates on the scheduling problem of the pre-flight preparation stage, which is the key stage of flight deck operations and costs the most time and manpower.…”
Section: Problem Description Of the Rspfdomentioning
confidence: 99%
“…The AL representation also suffers from the drawback that a single schedule can be represented by different activity lists, which is more obvious when a multiproject background with different released times is involved. However, this problem occurs more frequently with the form of RK in the single project [54]. To cope with this problem, Debels and Vanhoucke [56] embed the RK representation with the TO condition, which indicate that, for any two activities i and j (S i < S j ) in a given left-justified schedule, activity i should have a higher priority than activity j, thus ensuring that each schedule corresponds to only one representation.…”
Section: Proactive Robust Scheduling Optimization Algorithmmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…According to the fact that the aircraft relies on external power, the coordination and implementation of transfer between parking spots can be divided into towing and taxiing. How to plan a reasonable path based on the initial state (including the position and orientation of the aircraft), target state and environment on deck for an aircraft is an important part of deck scheduling [1].…”
Section: Introductionmentioning
confidence: 99%