2010
DOI: 10.1080/09500693.2010.520348
|View full text |Cite
|
Sign up to set email alerts
|

Designed and Spontaneous Gestures in Elementary Astronomy Education

Abstract: We make a case for using gestures and actions to understand and convey spatial and dynamic properties of systems. Problems in learning elementary astronomy are analysed in the context of demands of spatial thinking, in a system which is not amenable to direct perception, namely, the sun-earth-moon (SEM) system. We describe a pedagogy which uses gestures (most often in combination with concrete models and diagrams) to facilitate the visualisation and simulation required in elementary astronomy. These gestures a… Show more

Help me understand this report

Search citation statements

Order By: Relevance

Paper Sections

Select...
2
1
1

Citation Types

0
15
0

Year Published

2012
2012
2024
2024

Publication Types

Select...
3
3
1

Relationship

0
7

Authors

Journals

citations
Cited by 23 publications
(15 citation statements)
references
References 31 publications
(36 reference statements)
0
15
0
Order By: Relevance
“…Thus Padalkar and Ramadas (2011) focused on the role of gestures in the learning of elementary astronomy (the Earth-Moon-Sun system) in Grade 8 classes, Herrera and Riggs (2013) examined the use of gestures when US undergraduates learnt about stratigraphy in geology classes, and Roth and Welzel (2001) looked at the relationship between gestures, laboratory practical work, and conceptual learning for Grade 10 students of physics. These studies draw on a similar theoretical background and reach a consensus about the value of gesture as a mode of representation.…”
Section: The Gestural Modementioning
confidence: 99%
“…Thus Padalkar and Ramadas (2011) focused on the role of gestures in the learning of elementary astronomy (the Earth-Moon-Sun system) in Grade 8 classes, Herrera and Riggs (2013) examined the use of gestures when US undergraduates learnt about stratigraphy in geology classes, and Roth and Welzel (2001) looked at the relationship between gestures, laboratory practical work, and conceptual learning for Grade 10 students of physics. These studies draw on a similar theoretical background and reach a consensus about the value of gesture as a mode of representation.…”
Section: The Gestural Modementioning
confidence: 99%
“…Traditionally, the teachers of French primary classes use classical physical models which possess a large part of these parameters (i.e. manipulation possibilities, physical representation of celestial bodies, investigation possibilities...) crucial for astronomy learning [28,30,33,35].…”
mentioning
confidence: 99%
“…In talking with the students, the teacher used concrete models to question them (events 5, 7, and 14). The students used gestures at times when they were having difficulties expressing themselves (events 3, 10, 11, and 12)-something frequently reported in the literature (Goldin-Meadow, 1999;Goldin-Meadow & Alibali, 2013;Herrera & Riggs, 2013;Padalkar & Ramadas, 2011). Sometimes, these gestures were not essential to understanding the excerpt since their ideas were easily understood through speech alone.…”
Section: Dialogue Between the Teacher And A Group While Conducting Anmentioning
confidence: 92%
“…Research on the use of each of these modes of representation (or combinations of them) has been published mainly in the last decade (e.g. Adadan, 2013;Ainsworth, 2006;Herrera & Riggs, 2013;Padalkar & Ramadas, 2011;Prain, Tytler, & Peterson, 2009;Tang, Chee, & Yeo, 2011). Recently, four edited books (Gilbert & Treagust, 2009;Treagust & Tsui, 2013;Tytler, Prain, Hubber, & Waldrip, 2013;Verschaffel, Corte, de Jong, & Elen, 2010) focus on the role of multiple representations in science education.…”
Section: Representation In Science Educationmentioning
confidence: 97%
See 1 more Smart Citation