Design’s (Dis)orders: Mediating Systems-Level Transition Design

Tonkinwise, Cameron

doi:10.18682/cdc.vi73.1039

Cited by 6 publications

(6 citation statements)

References 16 publications

Supporting

Mentioning

Contrasting

Unclassified

Order By: Relevance

“…Existen generaciones de Derechos Humanos, y las últimas versiones incluyen a otros seres vivos, de tal forma, consideramos que este enfoque tiene una conexión directa con propuesta como el diseño para la transición (Tonkinwise, 2019). Consideramos que puede ser un punto concreto para consolidar dicho enfoque y superar ideas ligadas al antropocentrismo, y al mismo tiempo, cuestionar la práctica del diseño tradicional, la cual está fuertemente orientada a estimular el consumo.…”

Section: Discussionunclassified

Diseñar con perspectiva de Derechos Humanos: una primera aproximación hacia un cambio de paradigma

Ortiz-Nicolás

Hernández-López

2021

LAD

View full text Add to dashboard Cite

Este artículo presenta una propuesta para abordar los retos de diseño desde un enfoque de Derechos Humanos, ya sea para su cumplimiento, promoción ofortalecimiento. Para ilustrar la propuesta y guiar la reflexión, se hace referencia a dos derechos, por un lado, al derecho a la vivienda, de acuerdo con las estadísticas en México, el 38.4% de la población habita una vivienda inadecuada. Y, por otro, el derecho a la justicia, se estima que en México hay 23 millones de víctimas1 y un bajo acceso a la justicia. Se parte de la idea de que desarrollar una visión de Derechos Humanos conlleva un cambio de paradigma, entre otras cosas, porque: 1. El especialista comprenda la realidad desde la visión de las personas para quien diseña. 2. Mirar la realidad desde otros referentes (social, bienestar y dignidad). 3. Es una invitación a la reflexión, al análisis de sus propios valores humanos y cómo estos se plasman en su práctica de diseño. 4. Es unaalternativa para buscar y plantear nuevas soluciones con valor humano e integrales. 5. Se potencializa el trabajo transdisciplinario. 6. Es un medio para reflexionar sobre el aporte e impacto que tiene la disciplina del Diseño en las personas. Considerar los Derechos Humanos implica necesariamente cambiar la forma en que el diseñador observa, percibe y entiende la realidad. Además, conlleva indiscutiblemente a reformular la forma en que se plantea los retos de diseño, cómo se desarrollan y resuelven las soluciones de diseño. La propuesta es fundamentar la práctica del diseño en el marco de los Derechos Humanos,dicha práctica debe ser intencional, consciente y orientada a un reto específico.

show abstract

Section: Discussionunclassified

Diseñar con perspectiva de Derechos Humanos: una primera aproximación hacia un cambio de paradigma

Ortiz-Nicolás

Hernández-López

2021

LAD

View full text Add to dashboard Cite

show abstract

“…Tonkinwise [2] refers to the 'orders' of design practice, where design practice evolves from craft and a tradition of producing useful goods for people (1 st order), towards domains of design for services (2 nd order) and design for social innovation (3 rd order), with change-oriented design or Transitional Design the 4 th order, where a number of discourses including ecosystems science, sociotechnical innovation, and life changes (social psychology) are established. Indeed, it is apparent that we have moved from a client-centred and product manufacturing-centric model, in which designers contributed to mass consumerism, over-consumption, and consumer engineering, to a more considerate user-centred practice, with sustainability and closed loop deliberations, to designing experiences, to challenging established narratives (speculative design), towards a future of high-level complexity and systems level interventions.…”

Section: The Evolution Of Designmentioning

confidence: 99%

What Is 21st Century Design Education and Are We Doing It Wrong?

De Vere

2023

Proceedings of the International Conference on Engineering and Product Design Education, EPDE 2023

View full text Add to dashboard Cite

Designers are entrusted with increasingly complex challenges and the stakes have never been higher. The complex, risky and impactful endeavours of modern design reach far beyond the technical constraints and commercial rewards experienced by previous generations; now designers are expected to shoulder the burden of global challenges (e.g., the SDGs), to deal with complex human behaviours and societal concerns, plus the impact of the Anthropocene crisis, whilst navigating (and advocating for) new technologies and the erosion of traditional fields of practice. This is a model of practice where designers are shapers of society, activists and agents for change, rather than service providers. Despite the popularity of television shows that depict design as an aesthetic practice, design is no longer simply about 'making things pretty' or 'making it work better', cheaper to make, nicer to use, or more desirable, although there is still gainful employment in those missions. In design education, does an over-reliance on traditional skills and artifact production expressed through striking graduate exhibitions, work to the detriment of graduates and the profession, masking the urgent need for a comprehensive review of what, and how we teach design, and why? This paper aims to provide a critical provocation, seeking to understand the constantly evolving paradigm of design practice, to identify required graduate attributes and models of curricula and pedagogy that ensure that graduates are prepared and armed with the appropriate skillset for future global practice. Is design education still fit for purpose, or are we doing it wrong?

show abstract

“…Esse movimento desencadeou uma aceleração das atividades de compartilhamento online, ultrapassando os limites das comunidades, que ampliam o volume e a troca de informações e alteram a forma usual de lidar com a propriedade (Gansky, 2010). Segundo Tonkinwise (2014), o que impulsionou o desenvolvimento deste sistema foi a redução dos riscos de partilha, visto que atualmente existe mais acesso à informação, empresas e mercados.…”

Section: Economia Da Partilha: Conexão Pelo Acessounclassified

Dilemas da economia da partilha na era do acesso

2021

View full text Add to dashboard Cite

In the discussions involving the sharing economy, it is possible to see a tendency to highlight its positive aspects. However, the debates seem to neglect problematizations regarding the dilemmas and consequences of what sharing can mean for the social groups interested in embracing the sharing economy concept. In the age of access, the lack of ownership of goods may indicate a transformation concerning life in society. However, the essence of collaboration inherent in the sharing economy might be questioned, as the shared system would be just an attractive instrument with a friendly discourse mostly used to transfer the responsibility of the industry to the citizen, under the banner of mutual aid. Thus, our article seeks to investigate the different perspectives on sharing by analyzing its main dilemmas. Our study presents a critical view of the barriers, vulnerabilities and illusions present in this specific issue, which most studies and approaches on the subject end up reproducing. As a theoretical contribution to the literature, we point out that only those who have access to the sharing system are able to participate effectively, and their excesses reiterate the economicist and utilitarian structure based on inequality.

show abstract

Design’s (Dis)orders: Mediating Systems-Level Transition Design

Cited by 6 publications

References 16 publications

Diseñar con perspectiva de Derechos Humanos: una primera aproximación hacia un cambio de paradigma

Diseñar con perspectiva de Derechos Humanos: una primera aproximación hacia un cambio de paradigma

What Is 21st Century Design Education and Are We Doing It Wrong?

Dilemas da economia da partilha na era do acesso

Contact Info

Product

Resources

About