2007
DOI: 10.1021/jp067067e
|View full text |Cite
|
Sign up to set email alerts
|

Design of Tetrathiafulvalene-Based Phosphazenes Combining a Good Electron-Donor Capacity and Possible Inclusion Adduct Formation (Part II)

Abstract: Physical properties of intercalated porous material can be modulated by intercalation of small molecules, as this was demonstrated through the iodine (I2) intercalation into tris(o-phenylenedioxy)cyclotriphosphazene (TPP) crystals. This work describes in depth theoretical considerations of TPP derivatives. The core ring [(NP)3] substitution by [(CO)3], [(CNH)3], and [(CS)3], as well as the side group modification in size and composition (containing tetrathiafulvalene-like fragments), is well described from the… Show more

Help me understand this report

Search citation statements

Order By: Relevance

Paper Sections

Select...
2
2

Citation Types

3
19
0

Year Published

2010
2010
2016
2016

Publication Types

Select...
7

Relationship

3
4

Authors

Journals

citations
Cited by 29 publications
(22 citation statements)
references
References 71 publications
(82 reference statements)
3
19
0
Order By: Relevance
“…For example, the C 4 -S a is 1.758 Å at the B3LYP/6-31G(d) level, whereas the result of the PBE0 method is in the identical value (1.740 Å ) in comparison with the experimental data (1.740 Å ) [44]. This observation was consistent with our previous study [45] and the report by Jacquemin et al [46], in which the PBE0 was proven to be a method of choice for systems bearing sulfur atoms. Thus the PBE0/6-31G(d) method was used for all the geometry optimizations in the rest of our study.…”
Section: Choice Of the Methodssupporting
confidence: 91%
“…For example, the C 4 -S a is 1.758 Å at the B3LYP/6-31G(d) level, whereas the result of the PBE0 method is in the identical value (1.740 Å ) in comparison with the experimental data (1.740 Å ) [44]. This observation was consistent with our previous study [45] and the report by Jacquemin et al [46], in which the PBE0 was proven to be a method of choice for systems bearing sulfur atoms. Thus the PBE0/6-31G(d) method was used for all the geometry optimizations in the rest of our study.…”
Section: Choice Of the Methodssupporting
confidence: 91%
“…[39] The PBE0 was proven to be a method of choice for systems bearing sulfur atoms. [40] The HOMO–LUMO gap of 1 has been calculated as representation at the PBE0 level with 6‐31G(d) and 6‐31+G(d,p) basis set, respectively. The difference between the values obtained at the PBE0/6‐31G(d) (2.57 eV) and the PBE0/6‐31+G(d,p) (2.52 eV) levels for the HOMO–LUMO gap of 1 is pretty small (0.05 eV).…”
Section: Computational Detailsmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…To investigate the effect of different functionals on the molecular geometry, four density functionals including the B3LYP [20,31,37,38], PBE1PBE (also called PBE0) [39][40][41][42], B3PW91 [43], and BP86 [44] methods were used with the 6-31G* basis set in the geometry optimization of the ground state (S 0 ) in case of FT. The selected bond lengths, bond angles, and corresponding experimental values are listed in Table S1, together with the sketch of relative errors of functional effects for bond lengths.…”
Section: Methodsmentioning
confidence: 99%