International Electron Devices Meeting 1991 [Technical Digest]
DOI: 10.1109/iedm.1991.235374
|View full text |Cite
|
Sign up to set email alerts
|

Design of submicron PMOSFETs for DRAM array applications

Abstract: A comparison is made between surface-channel P+ polysilicon gate and buried-channel N+ polysilicon gate PMOSFETs used as switching devices in DRAM arrays in a 3.3 V CMOS technology. The criterion for this comparison is the "end-of-life" magnitude of subthreshold off-current at zero gate-to-source voltage, projected from accelerated hot-carrier stress. Shifts in off-current depend on changes in threshold voltage and subthreshold slope. The minimum channel length which satisfies the lifetime criterion of 100% sh… Show more

Help me understand this report

Search citation statements

Order By: Relevance

Paper Sections

Select...
1

Citation Types

0
1
0

Publication Types

Select...
2
2
1

Relationship

0
5

Authors

Journals

citations
Cited by 8 publications
(1 citation statement)
references
References 25 publications
0
1
0
Order By: Relevance
“…It is expected that the STI technology may modulate the high electric fields near the channelwidth edge resulting in the reliability variation along the channel-width direction, because the narrow-width or the inverse-narrow-width effects are largely influenced by the STI process [7,8]. Until now, the reliability comparison between the buried-and the surface-channel narrow-width p-MOSFETs fabricated by STI was reported [9]. Furthermore, the channelwidth dependences of the hot-carrier induced degradation have been studied for n-MOSFETs [6] and SOI n-MOSFETs [10], in which the narrow-width devices had inferior reliability due to the accelerated hot-carrier generation and the injection rates at the channel-region adjacent to the STI edge, and due to the lower gate-oxide-breakdown caused by the large edge current after the hot-carrier stressing around the channel-edge region, respectively.…”
Section: Introductionmentioning
confidence: 98%
“…It is expected that the STI technology may modulate the high electric fields near the channelwidth edge resulting in the reliability variation along the channel-width direction, because the narrow-width or the inverse-narrow-width effects are largely influenced by the STI process [7,8]. Until now, the reliability comparison between the buried-and the surface-channel narrow-width p-MOSFETs fabricated by STI was reported [9]. Furthermore, the channelwidth dependences of the hot-carrier induced degradation have been studied for n-MOSFETs [6] and SOI n-MOSFETs [10], in which the narrow-width devices had inferior reliability due to the accelerated hot-carrier generation and the injection rates at the channel-region adjacent to the STI edge, and due to the lower gate-oxide-breakdown caused by the large edge current after the hot-carrier stressing around the channel-edge region, respectively.…”
Section: Introductionmentioning
confidence: 98%