2020
DOI: 10.1109/lcomm.2019.2952375
|View full text |Cite
|
Sign up to set email alerts
|

Design of QAM-FBMC Waveforms Considering MMSE Receiver

Abstract: Due to its high spectral confinement characteristics and spectral efficiency, QAM-FBMC is considered a candidate waveform to replace CP-OFDM. QAM-FBMC has inevitable non-orthogonality both in time and frequency, and the system and filter must be well-designed to minimize the interferences. However, existing QAM-FBMC studies utilize a matched filter as the receiver filter, which is not suitable for a non-orthogonal system. Therefore, in this paper, we design the prototype filters considering the MMSE criterion,… Show more

Help me understand this report
View preprint versions

Search citation statements

Order By: Relevance

Paper Sections

Select...
1
1
1

Citation Types

0
3
0

Year Published

2022
2022
2024
2024

Publication Types

Select...
5
1

Relationship

0
6

Authors

Journals

citations
Cited by 9 publications
(17 citation statements)
references
References 11 publications
0
3
0
Order By: Relevance
“…New studies have proposed the use of matched filters as a reception filter taking into account the MMSE criterion [38].…”
Section: Fbmc and Its Variantsmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…New studies have proposed the use of matched filters as a reception filter taking into account the MMSE criterion [38].…”
Section: Fbmc and Its Variantsmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…The interference canceller disintegrates the received signal into even- as well as odd-numbered subcarriers and further decodes every symbol separately at the receiver end to successfully suppress the impact of interventions on the performance of the system. To reduce the interference in the FBMC QAM system, Han et al (2019) presented a stacked vectorization that was developed for minimum mean squared error (MMSE) equalizer. The effect of nonorthogonal filters on the performance of BER is examined in this research work.…”
Section: Related Workmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…The number of frequency domain coefficients of their filters was set as 7, 11, and 15, which led to the filters named Case A, Case B, and Case C, respectively. We can also cite filter design proposals based on carrier frequency offset (CFO) [21]; filter design proposals specifically for minimum mean square error (MMSE) based receiver for a given signal-to-noise rate (SNR) value [22]; and, more recently, a design based on the ISI minimization subject to OOBE limitation [23]. However, the performance evaluations of these prototype filters remain unsatisfactory, since each proposal considers different parameters for the optimization, such as specific SNR, bandwidth, or class of receiver.…”
Section: Introductionmentioning
confidence: 99%