2004
DOI: 10.1049/ip-cta:20040513
|View full text |Cite
|
Sign up to set email alerts
|

Design of LPV control systems based on Youla parameterisation

Help me understand this report

Search citation statements

Order By: Relevance

Paper Sections

Select...
2
1
1
1

Citation Types

0
27
0
1

Year Published

2008
2008
2024
2024

Publication Types

Select...
7
2
1

Relationship

1
9

Authors

Journals

citations
Cited by 46 publications
(29 citation statements)
references
References 11 publications
0
27
0
1
Order By: Relevance
“…From this figure, it can be seen that M (θ) must be designed to ensure stability of the closed-loop system formed by M (θ) − I and the nonlinear operator and to minimize the effect of the y d on the controlled variable. Moreover, applying the LPV coprime factorization introduced in [31] to the LPV system G(θ), the design of the AW compensator reduces to the design of a parameter-varying state-feedback gain fulfilling an induced L 2 norm condition. More precisely, let…”
Section: B Anti-windup Compensationmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…From this figure, it can be seen that M (θ) must be designed to ensure stability of the closed-loop system formed by M (θ) − I and the nonlinear operator and to minimize the effect of the y d on the controlled variable. Moreover, applying the LPV coprime factorization introduced in [31] to the LPV system G(θ), the design of the AW compensator reduces to the design of a parameter-varying state-feedback gain fulfilling an induced L 2 norm condition. More precisely, let…”
Section: B Anti-windup Compensationmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…Remark 2 So far, the results presented have been fairly straightforward extensions of coprime factorisations from LTI to LPV systems; however, we would like to emphasise that these extensions are, in fact, not trivial at all due to the parameter dependency. Indeed, the cumbersome notation (3)- (18) has been deliberately chosen to avoid any confusion with normal transfer functions, since we allow θ-dependency in the B and C matrices (as opposed to, e.g., [14], which only allows A to be θ-dependent). For the same reason, we avoid parameter-dependent state transformations throughout the paper.…”
Section: Lpv System Factorisationmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…The following mass spring damper system with time varying spring stiffness has been considered in [23]:…”
Section: Numerical Examplementioning
confidence: 99%