2010
DOI: 10.1201/b10471
|View full text |Cite
|
Sign up to set email alerts
|

Design of Low-Power Coarse-Grained Reconfigurable Architectures

Help me understand this report

Search citation statements

Order By: Relevance

Paper Sections

Select...
1
1
1
1

Citation Types

1
5
0

Year Published

2013
2013
2017
2017

Publication Types

Select...
3
2

Relationship

1
4

Authors

Journals

citations
Cited by 6 publications
(6 citation statements)
references
References 0 publications
1
5
0
Order By: Relevance
“…The average application speedup is 2.48 for all microprocessor systems and all applications. Such amounts of speedups were also considered as important in previous works considering a processor extended with a coarsegrained reconfigurable data-path as in [10], [11]. We also mention that the reported speedups for each application and for each processor type are close to theoretical speedup bounds, especially for the ARM7 systems.…”
Section: Resultssupporting
confidence: 60%
See 1 more Smart Citation
“…The average application speedup is 2.48 for all microprocessor systems and all applications. Such amounts of speedups were also considered as important in previous works considering a processor extended with a coarsegrained reconfigurable data-path as in [10], [11]. We also mention that the reported speedups for each application and for each processor type are close to theoretical speedup bounds, especially for the ARM7 systems.…”
Section: Resultssupporting
confidence: 60%
“…In [9], a PipeRench architecture clocked at 100MHz and composed by 8-bit PEs and 53 128-bit stripes, improved on average the execution time by 12% and 7.2% for the PGP data encryption algorithm and for JPEG, respectively, relative to the execution on an UltraSparcII running at 300 MHz. In [10], it is shown that a hybrid architecture composed by an ARM926EJ-S and an 8x8 Reconfigurable Array similar to MorphoSys [3], executes 2.2 times faster an H.263 encoder than a single ARM926EJ-S processor. The mapping flow for the ADRES architecture was applied to an MPEG-2 decoder in [11].…”
Section: Preliminariesmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…Until now, there have been a few multi‐core architecture projects based on CGRAs [1–16] for kernel‐level parallelism [6, 7–9]. However, most of them are monotonous aggregation of several CGRAs.…”
Section: Related Workmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…On the other hand, application‐specific optimisation of embedded system becomes inevitable to satisfy the market demand for designers to meet tighter constraints on cost, performance, and power. To compromise these incompatible demands, coarse‐grained reconfigurable architecture (CGRA) has emerged as a suitable solution for embedded systems [1, 2]. It can boost the performance by adopting multiple processing elements (PEs) while it can be reconfigured to adapt to evolving characteristics of the embedded applications such as audio, video, and graphics processing.…”
Section: Introductionmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…In (FPGA)-based systems. However FPGAs are not the only type of [10] Coarse-grain reconfigurable logic has been mainly proposed for…”
mentioning
confidence: 99%