2004
DOI: 10.1109/tvlsi.2004.827562
|View full text |Cite
|
Sign up to set email alerts
|

Design of FPGA interconnect for multilevel metallization

Abstract: Abstract-How does multilevel metallization impact the design of field-programmable gate arrays (FPGA) interconnect? The availability of a growing number of metal layers presents the opportunity to use wiring in the third dimension to reduce area and switch requirements. Unfortunately, traditional FPGA wiring schemes are not designed to exploit these additional metal layers. We introduce an alternate topology, based on Leighton's mesh-of-trees (MoT), which carefully exploits hierarchy to allow additional metal … Show more

Help me understand this report

Search citation statements

Order By: Relevance

Paper Sections

Select...
1
1
1
1

Citation Types

0
17
0

Year Published

2008
2008
2015
2015

Publication Types

Select...
4
2
2

Relationship

0
8

Authors

Journals

citations
Cited by 36 publications
(17 citation statements)
references
References 19 publications
0
17
0
Order By: Relevance
“…Previous works [10][11][12], also confirms the multilevel BFT based 2D interconnect topology is able to reduce 59 % of the total number of switches and save 56 % of the total FPGA area compared to Mesh-based FPGA with identical logic density and array size [10]. Considering the challenges associated with 2D physical design of Tree-based FPGA [13,14], we proposed two different network partitioning methodology to design and implement high density 3D FPGAs based on Tree-based interconnect network. The main focus of this chapter is on the discussion of the complete set of tools and technologies needed to conduct 3D design feasibility study and interconnect network characterization methodologies to build high performance 3D re-configurable systems based on Tree-based interconnect and a comparison procedure has been put in place and the end to validate the advantages of 3D Tree-based FPGA over 3D Mesh-based FPGA architectures.…”
Section: D Tree-based Interconnect: a Comparison With 2dmentioning
confidence: 69%
See 1 more Smart Citation
“…Previous works [10][11][12], also confirms the multilevel BFT based 2D interconnect topology is able to reduce 59 % of the total number of switches and save 56 % of the total FPGA area compared to Mesh-based FPGA with identical logic density and array size [10]. Considering the challenges associated with 2D physical design of Tree-based FPGA [13,14], we proposed two different network partitioning methodology to design and implement high density 3D FPGAs based on Tree-based interconnect network. The main focus of this chapter is on the discussion of the complete set of tools and technologies needed to conduct 3D design feasibility study and interconnect network characterization methodologies to build high performance 3D re-configurable systems based on Tree-based interconnect and a comparison procedure has been put in place and the end to validate the advantages of 3D Tree-based FPGA over 3D Mesh-based FPGA architectures.…”
Section: D Tree-based Interconnect: a Comparison With 2dmentioning
confidence: 69%
“…The interconnect delay of Treebased architecture increases exponentially [10,14,18] as the Tree grows to higher levels. Horizontal partitioning methodology is introduced optimize the exponential rise in Tree network delay as the Tree grows to higher levels.…”
Section: Horizontal Partitioningmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…The crosspoint architecture uses dedicated wires to statically route events between neurons. This routing methodology is used commonly in FPGA designs [14], which share the fundamental problem of efficiently connecting large numbers of computational blocks with a configurable interconnect. While full NxN neural interconnectivity would be prohibitively large in terms of area, it is unnecessary, as the biological systems that we are emulating have limited fanout and connectivity.…”
Section: Alternative Interconnectsmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…Figure 2 shows the MoT topology of [5] with four PCs and four memory modules (MMs). Unlike earlier MoT topologies of [8,12,13], PCs and MMs are placed at the roots of the trees instead of the leaves. The MoT network consists of two main structures: a set of fan-out trees and a set of fan-in trees Figure 2(b) shows the binary fan-out trees, where each PC is a root and connects to two children, and each child has two children of their own.…”
Section: Mesh Of Trees Networkmentioning
confidence: 99%