The platform will undergo maintenance on Sep 14 at about 7:45 AM EST and will be unavailable for approximately 2 hours.
2017 IEEE 7th International Conference on Consumer Electronics - Berlin (ICCE-Berlin) 2017
DOI: 10.1109/icce-berlin.2017.8210598
|View full text |Cite
|
Sign up to set email alerts
|

Design of fog computing based IoT application architecture

Help me understand this report

Search citation statements

Order By: Relevance

Paper Sections

Select...
2
1
1

Citation Types

0
1
0
2

Year Published

2019
2019
2022
2022

Publication Types

Select...
5
2
1

Relationship

0
8

Authors

Journals

citations
Cited by 17 publications
(4 citation statements)
references
References 3 publications
0
1
0
2
Order By: Relevance
“…Based on the issues fog systems were supposed to solve, early research focused on fog systems that aimed to keep the latency at a minimum [21,31], increase the bandwidth to communicate large amounts of data [32], and improve the energy efficiency to preserve edge devices [33], among others. As further requirements became more and more critical for modern networks (such as security and privacy in healthcare [14], reliability in mobility [40], or interoperability in IoT [41]), increasingly more research on fog systems expanded the set of potential characteristics to focus on. Contemporary articles from quadrant A can be organized into three subcategories: first, research examining use-case or industry-specific fog systems mostly focuses on discussing and improving characteristics that are most relevant for their application (e.g., [14,42]).…”
Section: B Related Researchmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…Based on the issues fog systems were supposed to solve, early research focused on fog systems that aimed to keep the latency at a minimum [21,31], increase the bandwidth to communicate large amounts of data [32], and improve the energy efficiency to preserve edge devices [33], among others. As further requirements became more and more critical for modern networks (such as security and privacy in healthcare [14], reliability in mobility [40], or interoperability in IoT [41]), increasingly more research on fog systems expanded the set of potential characteristics to focus on. Contemporary articles from quadrant A can be organized into three subcategories: first, research examining use-case or industry-specific fog systems mostly focuses on discussing and improving characteristics that are most relevant for their application (e.g., [14,42]).…”
Section: B Related Researchmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…The result is that migration time and service downtime can be significantly reduced with regard to a simpler and more traditional migration of the whole application. Always to preserve a given level of QoS, [8] deploys a Fog server between a supported application and each used IoT service, in order to allow applications to access multiple IoT services more efficiently. In addition, [9] develops a cloud-fog computing architecture for information-centric IoT applications with specific support for job classification and resource scheduling functions.…”
Section: Related Workmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…Por otro lado, las aplicaciones Fog suelen expresarse como un flujo dirigido en el que cada componente tiene entradas y/o salidas (workflow) [4], [5], [7], [9], [14]. Cada componente debe cumplir con una función específica, distribuyendo así la funcionalidad de la aplicación [7].…”
Section: Introductionunclassified
“…De hecho, varios trabajos han aplicado técnicas de modelado para la definición de aplicaciones Fog siguiendo este enfoque orientado al flujo de datos. Sin embargo, ninguno de ellos ofrece herramientas para abordar la concepción, diseño y despliegue de este tipo de aplicaciones [3], [4], [9]. Es más, a pesar de los intentos de estandarización, por lo que los autores saben, el diseño y la composición de las aplicaciones suele resolverse con el desarrollo de soluciones ad-hoc para cada situación, no siendo aplicables a diferentes dominios de aplicación.…”
Section: Introductionunclassified