2017
DOI: 10.1016/j.snb.2017.03.086
|View full text |Cite
|
Sign up to set email alerts
|

Design of a LED-based sensor for monitoring the lower explosion limit of methane

Help me understand this report

Search citation statements

Order By: Relevance

Paper Sections

Select...
4
1

Citation Types

3
51
0
6

Year Published

2017
2017
2022
2022

Publication Types

Select...
4
1

Relationship

2
3

Authors

Journals

citations
Cited by 43 publications
(60 citation statements)
references
References 21 publications
3
51
0
6
Order By: Relevance
“…To enable a test of larger temperature ranges, the system, including the electronics, has been placed in a climatic chamber and the change in signal as a function of temperature has been recorded in the range of 15–45°C. Figure B shows the results revealing a linear dependence of the signal on temperature, which is in accordance with previously obtained results and in contrast to systems employing only semiconductor components, which show exponential dependence on changes in temperature.…”
Section: Resultssupporting
confidence: 91%
See 3 more Smart Citations
“…To enable a test of larger temperature ranges, the system, including the electronics, has been placed in a climatic chamber and the change in signal as a function of temperature has been recorded in the range of 15–45°C. Figure B shows the results revealing a linear dependence of the signal on temperature, which is in accordance with previously obtained results and in contrast to systems employing only semiconductor components, which show exponential dependence on changes in temperature.…”
Section: Resultssupporting
confidence: 91%
“…The results presented here do concur to a considerable degree with the readings from a state of the art gas measurement device. The main deviation occurs in the methane channel reading and the timing coincides with extraordinary high concentrations of H 2 S. Cross‐sensitivities towards this latter gas can be ruled out due to the working principle of the photoacoustic sensor setup employed . Likewise, mechanical instabilities are unlikely the cause of this since the adjacent CO 2 channel does not suffer at all.…”
Section: Resultsmentioning
confidence: 96%
See 2 more Smart Citations
“…For CO 2 the resolution is better than 8900 ppm and for CH 4 better than 15 000 ppm. No cross‐sensitivity against water vapor has been observed so far , .…”
Section: Resultsmentioning
confidence: 99%