2016
DOI: 10.1109/tvlsi.2015.2401037
|View full text |Cite
|
Sign up to set email alerts
|

Design of a CMOS System-on-Chip for Passive, Near-Field Ultrasonic Energy Harvesting and Back-Telemetry

Abstract: Many packaging and structural materials are made of conductive materials such as metal or carbon-fiber composites, which limits the use of embedded radio frequency-based telemetry systems for sensing. In this paper, we present the design of a complete passive ultrasonic energy harvesting and back-telemetry system that exploits near-field acoustic coupling to wirelessly transfer energy and data across conductive barriers. The use of near-field operation makes the telemetry robust to multipath reflections that o… Show more

Help me understand this report

Search citation statements

Order By: Relevance

Paper Sections

Select...
2
1
1

Citation Types

0
4
0

Year Published

2016
2016
2022
2022

Publication Types

Select...
5
2

Relationship

0
7

Authors

Journals

citations
Cited by 7 publications
(4 citation statements)
references
References 28 publications
0
4
0
Order By: Relevance
“…This work mainly concerns the design of a US-Data Down-Link embedding the proposed fully digital BPSK demodulator. Indeed, the state-of-the-art presents several modulation schemes, such as the ASK [18,19], PWM-ASK [20], OOK [19,21,22], and OOK-PM [23,24], while the BPSK demodulation has often been used for RF-powered IMDs [25][26][27][28][29][30][31].…”
Section: Starvedmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…This work mainly concerns the design of a US-Data Down-Link embedding the proposed fully digital BPSK demodulator. Indeed, the state-of-the-art presents several modulation schemes, such as the ASK [18,19], PWM-ASK [20], OOK [19,21,22], and OOK-PM [23,24], while the BPSK demodulation has often been used for RF-powered IMDs [25][26][27][28][29][30][31].…”
Section: Starvedmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…Feng et al introduced a complete system to harvest passive ultrasonic energy through conductive environment [93]. The prototype of the system was examined by Systemon-Chip (SoC) implementation in 0.5 m CMOS technology.…”
Section: Developments Of Aetmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…This is due to the drawbacks in the CMOS process, such as low-currentdriving capabilities, no substrate via holes, low-quality factor, and the low breakdown voltage [11], [12]. However, to reduce the cost and size, the realization of RFIC favorably needs to be implemented with the CMOS process to achieve the goal of system-on-chip (SoC) [13].…”
Section: Introductionmentioning
confidence: 99%