2012 IEEE 15th International Symposium on Design and Diagnostics of Electronic Circuits &Amp; Systems (DDECS) 2012
DOI: 10.1109/ddecs.2012.6219014
|View full text |Cite
|
Sign up to set email alerts
|

Design methodology for fault tolerant ASICs

Help me understand this report

Search citation statements

Order By: Relevance

Paper Sections

Select...
2
2
1

Citation Types

0
5
0

Year Published

2013
2013
2016
2016

Publication Types

Select...
4
2

Relationship

0
6

Authors

Journals

citations
Cited by 11 publications
(5 citation statements)
references
References 12 publications
0
5
0
Order By: Relevance
“…Finally, the zero suppression circuitry combines the parallel outputs of the cluster detection, and reduces the data flow by skipping non-hit clusters. SEU mitigation techniques [9] were implemented to improve radiation hardness of critical blocks (figure 6). Most critical units like internal configuration storage registers, reset management and the sequencer were protected using triple modular redundancy with 70 µm distance between modules.…”
Section: Digital Signal Processing and Zero Suppression Unitmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…Finally, the zero suppression circuitry combines the parallel outputs of the cluster detection, and reduces the data flow by skipping non-hit clusters. SEU mitigation techniques [9] were implemented to improve radiation hardness of critical blocks (figure 6). Most critical units like internal configuration storage registers, reset management and the sequencer were protected using triple modular redundancy with 70 µm distance between modules.…”
Section: Digital Signal Processing and Zero Suppression Unitmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…The proposed SEL protection switch is shown in Figure 1. It is an improved version of the switch presented in [23] and [24]. The main task of this circuit is to switch off the power supply in case of the excessive supply current.…”
Section: Latchup Protectionmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…It means that the redundancy is lost during the latchup protection. However, modifications of the voter feed-back logic are necessary since the standard self-voting DMR circuit is very sensitive to a SET hitting the flip-flop data input near the active clock edge [23].…”
Section: Self-voting Dmr With Latchup Protectionmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…Hence, although DMR approaches are not capable of error correction, they are widely used for their lower area overhead and power consumption. In addition, their error detection property, improves the robustness of a component against failures (Petrovic et al, 2012). In crucial tasks where the reliability is of great importance, such as in aerospace applications, the designers have to accept the area and power overhead to increase the reliability.…”
Section: Introductionmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…Many different DMR and TMR approaches have been proposed. Petrovic et al, (Petrovic et al, 2012), have proposed a novel self-voting DMR approach which freezes the output when detects a transient error on one of the modules outputs. Another DMR approach is also suggested in (Teifel, 2008) which guarantees the same level of Single-Event Transient (SET) protection as a TMR approach for SET pulses with less width than a constant value.…”
Section: Introductionmentioning
confidence: 99%