2020
DOI: 10.1007/s10639-020-10390-2
|View full text |Cite
|
Sign up to set email alerts
|

Design, development and evaluation of open interactive learning objects for secondary school physical education

Help me understand this report

Search citation statements

Order By: Relevance

Paper Sections

Select...
2
1
1
1

Citation Types

0
12
0
1

Year Published

2021
2021
2023
2023

Publication Types

Select...
8
2

Relationship

0
10

Authors

Journals

citations
Cited by 19 publications
(15 citation statements)
references
References 17 publications
0
12
0
1
Order By: Relevance
“…Also, in Papastergiou & Mastrogiannis (2021) research, it is mentioned that the DLO is divided into two categories. Those who have a teaching orientation and those who have constructivism.…”
Section: Characteristics Of Digital Learning Objectsmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…Also, in Papastergiou & Mastrogiannis (2021) research, it is mentioned that the DLO is divided into two categories. Those who have a teaching orientation and those who have constructivism.…”
Section: Characteristics Of Digital Learning Objectsmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…Many studies report it as a serious problem around the globe as well as in different parts of Europe [19][20][21][22][23][24][25][26]. Academic reforms are defined by them as the inability of today's academic institutions to fulfill the demands of modern societies in the west.…”
Section: Introductionmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…This could lead teachers to understand the evaluation of DERs and help them in their professional development to produce high-quality resources considering pedagogical, technological, content, accessibility, and contextual criteria. However, the proper evaluation of DERs specifically for school Physical Education still lacks further systematization 37 .…”
Section: Evaluation Of the Mec Red Platformmentioning
confidence: 99%