1992
DOI: 10.1002/aic.690381106
|View full text |Cite
|
Sign up to set email alerts
|

Design considerations for tubular reactors with highly exothermic reactions

Help me understand this report

Search citation statements

Order By: Relevance

Paper Sections

Select...
1
1
1
1

Citation Types

1
20
0

Year Published

1998
1998
2022
2022

Publication Types

Select...
5
3

Relationship

0
8

Authors

Journals

citations
Cited by 29 publications
(21 citation statements)
references
References 21 publications
1
20
0
Order By: Relevance
“…3), where the inlet air temperature was 200 °C and the highest temperature rise was limited to 50 °C. The multitubular reactor is one of the typical reactors for highly exothermic reactions 40. The monolith reactor is widely applied to exothermic heterogeneous gas‐phase reactions like ammonia oxidation and catalytic partial oxidation of methane to synthesis gas by adiabatic operation 41, 42.…”
Section: Resultsmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…3), where the inlet air temperature was 200 °C and the highest temperature rise was limited to 50 °C. The multitubular reactor is one of the typical reactors for highly exothermic reactions 40. The monolith reactor is widely applied to exothermic heterogeneous gas‐phase reactions like ammonia oxidation and catalytic partial oxidation of methane to synthesis gas by adiabatic operation 41, 42.…”
Section: Resultsmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…This phenomenon may increase in severity when multi-tubular reactors are used, as slight differences in packing may lead to maldistribution of the flow between the different tubes (Afandizadeh and Foumeny, 2001). The use of a multi-tubular configuration is, however, often required as radial heat transfer in a packed bed is low and causes hot spots to arise in larger diameter vessels (Shinnar et al, 1992;Vervloet et al, 2013).…”
Section: Granulesmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…Conventionally, these tubes are randomly packed with particles. A complication that is often encountered is packing inconsistencies amongst the different tubes that manifest themselves in a maldistribution of the flow caused by differences in pressure drop (Shinnar et al, 1992). One notable benefit that a 3D-printed catalyst may offer is consistency; as the printed structures are identical, the pressure drop over the different tubes is exactly the same and thus the even distribution of reactants is facilitated.…”
Section: The Reactor Scalementioning
confidence: 99%
“…Since one cannot control the temperature dynamically in thousands of reactor tubes with varying flow rates, one would design a tubular reactor with a large heat-transfer area and a small temperature drop such that the effective temperature is that of the cooling medium, which is dynamically controlled to be practically constant (see Shinnar et al, 1992). Contrary to the laboratory, however, the control of all dominant variables may not be possible in real operation for a variety of technological reasons.…”
Section: Aiche Journal December 2000mentioning
confidence: 99%