1997
DOI: 10.1109/82.592569
|View full text |Cite
|
Sign up to set email alerts
|

Design considerations for direct-conversion receivers

Abstract: This paper describes the issues and tradeoffs in the design and monolithic implementation of direct-conversion receivers and proposes circuit techniques that can alleviate the drawbacks of this architecture. Following a brief study of heterodyne and image-reject topologies, the direct-conversion architecture is introduced and effects such as dc offset, I=Q mismatch, even-order distortion, flicker noise, and oscillator leakage are analyzed. Related design techniques for amplification and mixing, quadrature phas… Show more

Help me understand this report

Search citation statements

Order By: Relevance

Paper Sections

Select...
3
1
1

Citation Types

1
373
0
6

Year Published

2000
2000
2016
2016

Publication Types

Select...
6
4

Relationship

0
10

Authors

Journals

citations
Cited by 963 publications
(390 citation statements)
references
References 17 publications
1
373
0
6
Order By: Relevance
“…Digital implementation of direct conversion between the baseband and the radio frequency not only greatly simplifies the architecture of the transceiver, it also brings higher precision of measurements, as well as reductions in size, weight, cost, and maintenance of the instrument. However, while digital transceivers have been in practice for years [Razavi, 1997], it is with a great deal of caution that direct-to-RF technology was considered for the HF receiver design in the Digisonde. Digital receivers that directly digitize the RF signals can easily be saturated by strong interferers, since ADCs have a limited dynamic range, rendering the receivers insensitive to smaller message signals.…”
Section: Digital Transceiver For the Digisonde-4dmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…Digital implementation of direct conversion between the baseband and the radio frequency not only greatly simplifies the architecture of the transceiver, it also brings higher precision of measurements, as well as reductions in size, weight, cost, and maintenance of the instrument. However, while digital transceivers have been in practice for years [Razavi, 1997], it is with a great deal of caution that direct-to-RF technology was considered for the HF receiver design in the Digisonde. Digital receivers that directly digitize the RF signals can easily be saturated by strong interferers, since ADCs have a limited dynamic range, rendering the receivers insensitive to smaller message signals.…”
Section: Digital Transceiver For the Digisonde-4dmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…several benefits for I/Q mismatch, flicker noise and DC-offset [Raz97], but we will here concentrate on the idealized case We have noted in the "Why I/Q" section that an I/Q receiver is required if the frequency is the same on both of the mixer inputs, while as we have argued, we can avoid an I/Q conversion in the analog domain when we have a frequency offset. To show this in the heterodyning case, we write…”
Section: Sfcw With Frequency Offsetmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…The above references do not consider the effect of the in-phase and quadrature (I/Q) phase imbalance. The I/Q imbalance is due to the mismatch of the amplitude and phase components between the I-branch and Q-branch [6]. It is known that the I/Q imbalance can severely degrade the performance of OFDM systems.…”
Section: Introductionmentioning
confidence: 99%