2018 IEEE Indian Conference on Antennas and Propogation (InCAP) 2018
DOI: 10.1109/incap.2018.8770868
|View full text |Cite
|
Sign up to set email alerts
|

Design Consideration of High Gain Microstrip Antenna Arrays for Telemetry Tracking and Command System of Geostationary Satellites

Help me understand this report

Search citation statements

Order By: Relevance

Paper Sections

Select...
2

Citation Types

0
2
0

Year Published

2020
2020
2023
2023

Publication Types

Select...
3
2

Relationship

1
4

Authors

Journals

citations
Cited by 5 publications
(2 citation statements)
references
References 4 publications
0
2
0
Order By: Relevance
“…[1][2][3][4][5][6][7][8][9][10] The microstrip-feed has well-known advantages for its compactness, low-profile, and low-cost; but its ohmic loss, radiation losses from junctions and discontinuities limit the achievable gain and cross-polar (XP) isolations. [10][11][12][13][14][15] XP radiations in microstrip-fed array and its control is the primary focus of this investigation. Techniques with complex/dual-layer feeds with increased structural volume, such as dog-bone shaped aperture coupling, 16 cavity-backing, [17][18] substrate-integrated waveguide-fed coupling, [19][20] differential feeding, 21 were explored for controlling XP radiations in microstrip-fed arrays.…”
Section: Introductionmentioning
confidence: 99%
See 1 more Smart Citation
“…[1][2][3][4][5][6][7][8][9][10] The microstrip-feed has well-known advantages for its compactness, low-profile, and low-cost; but its ohmic loss, radiation losses from junctions and discontinuities limit the achievable gain and cross-polar (XP) isolations. [10][11][12][13][14][15] XP radiations in microstrip-fed array and its control is the primary focus of this investigation. Techniques with complex/dual-layer feeds with increased structural volume, such as dog-bone shaped aperture coupling, 16 cavity-backing, [17][18] substrate-integrated waveguide-fed coupling, [19][20] differential feeding, 21 were explored for controlling XP radiations in microstrip-fed arrays.…”
Section: Introductionmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…While the properties of individual element, mode of excitation, and physical arrangements are the determining factors in designing an array, feed network is an important point of consideration based on power handling and tolerable loss 1–10 . The microstrip‐feed has well‐known advantages for its compactness, low‐profile, and low‐cost; but its ohmic loss, radiation losses from junctions and discontinuities limit the achievable gain and cross‐polar (XP) isolations 10–15 . XP radiations in microstrip‐fed array and its control is the primary focus of this investigation.…”
Section: Introductionmentioning
confidence: 99%