2014
DOI: 10.1002/cad.20074
|View full text |Cite
|
Sign up to set email alerts
|

Design and Validation of Assessment Tests for Young Children in Zambia

Abstract: Early childhood education has received unprecedented attention among African policymakers in recent years, recognizing that the early years form an important foundation upon which later development is anchored and noting evidence that various Early Childhood Development (ECD) indicators are predictive of future academic success. Central to the provision of quality early childhood education is assessment of developmental outcomes. But currently there is little systematic documentation of culturally appropriate … Show more

Help me understand this report

Search citation statements

Order By: Relevance

Paper Sections

Select...
3
1
1

Citation Types

0
20
0

Year Published

2016
2016
2022
2022

Publication Types

Select...
4
3
1

Relationship

1
7

Authors

Journals

citations
Cited by 22 publications
(21 citation statements)
references
References 42 publications
0
20
0
Order By: Relevance
“…Methods bias includes differences in assessment administration, such as, the language and medium of delivery and stimuli used, that may favor one group over another (Matafwali and Serpell, 2014). This, in turn, may also impact on item bias, which refers to differences in observed performance despite equal abilities on a particular skill based on participants' cultural or linguistic background.…”
Section: Introductionmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…Methods bias includes differences in assessment administration, such as, the language and medium of delivery and stimuli used, that may favor one group over another (Matafwali and Serpell, 2014). This, in turn, may also impact on item bias, which refers to differences in observed performance despite equal abilities on a particular skill based on participants' cultural or linguistic background.…”
Section: Introductionmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…A Zambia-adapted version of the PPVT was considered but deemed not suitable for our main sample of children > 8 years old, as it was developed with item content only suitable for younger children < 6 years old. 33 This would have led to ceiling effects with our sample which enrolls adolescents as old as 19 years of age.…”
Section: Solutionmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…We cannot be exhaustive here, but recent examples include the Ages and Stages Questionnaire, adapted for Zambia and South Africa (Hsiao et al, ). Other Zambian examples include a non‐verbal reasoning test for rural children (Zuilkowski, McCoy, Serpell, Matafwali, & Fink, ), the Panga Munthu Test, and the Zambia Child Assessment Tool (Matafwali & Serpell, ).…”
Section: Introductionmentioning
confidence: 99%