2017
DOI: 10.1016/j.adhoc.2017.10.001
|View full text |Cite
|
Sign up to set email alerts
|

Design and performance analysis of a full-duplex MAC protocol for wireless local area networks

Help me understand this report

Search citation statements

Order By: Relevance

Paper Sections

Select...
2
1
1
1

Citation Types

0
10
0
1

Year Published

2019
2019
2022
2022

Publication Types

Select...
7
1
1

Relationship

0
9

Authors

Journals

citations
Cited by 21 publications
(11 citation statements)
references
References 31 publications
0
10
0
1
Order By: Relevance
“…Many existing FD MAC protocols have been addressed for ad-hoc mode networks deployment [26]- [30]. Although, some other works were focused on FD MAC protocol design for the infrastructure mode [31], [32].…”
Section: Related Work and Motivationmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…Many existing FD MAC protocols have been addressed for ad-hoc mode networks deployment [26]- [30]. Although, some other works were focused on FD MAC protocol design for the infrastructure mode [31], [32].…”
Section: Related Work and Motivationmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…Marlali and Grubuz [56] have proposed a shared random back-off based full duplex MAC protocol in which a PT and PR shares their chosen back-off slots with each other for the next FD transmission. The protocol operates in both HD and FD mode.…”
Section: • Pr Is Transmitting To Pt •mentioning
confidence: 99%
“…• Limited IBFD considerations: the IBFD MAC protocol in [17] focuses on simultaneous transmitting and sensing, but the analysis does not fully exploit IBFD benefits for increasing throughput and reducing latency. The authors of [18] model a new MAC protocol as a three-dimensional DTMC to use IBFD-synchronized transmission only after a successful HD transmission, but the model does not treat collisions accurately. • Impractical network topology: while [19] addresses both throughput and delay in the three-dimensional DTMC analysis for a proposed distributed MAC protocol, the work primarily focuses on multi-hop networks.…”
Section: Related Workmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…The system-level analyses presented in this paper do not require accounting for this slight increase in latency. If the header size increases by changing the frame structure to serve special IBFD features like in [18], [27], and [40], then careful consideration for the header is necessary. However, this paper introduces no changes in any frame format.…”
Section: System Model and Operational Scenariomentioning
confidence: 99%