2018
DOI: 10.3934/energy.2018.4.576
|View full text |Cite
|
Sign up to set email alerts
|

Design and performance analysis of quantitative feedback theory basedautomated robust controller : An application to uncertain autonomous windpower system

Help me understand this report

Search citation statements

Order By: Relevance

Paper Sections

Select...
1

Citation Types

0
1
0

Year Published

2020
2020
2022
2022

Publication Types

Select...
2
2

Relationship

0
4

Authors

Journals

citations
Cited by 4 publications
(1 citation statement)
references
References 9 publications
0
1
0
Order By: Relevance
“…From QFT control toolbox we can find that the selected frequency set for the design is, S = 2𝜋 {1, 2.5, 7.5, 10, 20, 30, 50, 100, 200, 274, 350, 500, 1000, 2000, 5000, 12,500} Hz Now tour goal is to use loop shaping technique so that we can add suitable poles/zeros to the selected plant model with the end goal to fulfill the QFT limits at every frequency [25]. Fulfilling the limits implies the nominal plant must lie, over the open limits at low frequency and outside of the closed margin of stability limits at high frequency for the purpose of satisfying the specification limitation and so the designed controller is [8,28]:…”
Section: Margin Of Stability For Robustnessmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…From QFT control toolbox we can find that the selected frequency set for the design is, S = 2𝜋 {1, 2.5, 7.5, 10, 20, 30, 50, 100, 200, 274, 350, 500, 1000, 2000, 5000, 12,500} Hz Now tour goal is to use loop shaping technique so that we can add suitable poles/zeros to the selected plant model with the end goal to fulfill the QFT limits at every frequency [25]. Fulfilling the limits implies the nominal plant must lie, over the open limits at low frequency and outside of the closed margin of stability limits at high frequency for the purpose of satisfying the specification limitation and so the designed controller is [8,28]:…”
Section: Margin Of Stability For Robustnessmentioning
confidence: 99%