Signal Processing for 5G 2016
DOI: 10.1002/9781119116493.ch17
|View full text |Cite
|
Sign up to set email alerts
|

Design and Implementation of Full‐duplex Transceivers

Help me understand this report

Search citation statements

Order By: Relevance

Paper Sections

Select...
1
1
1
1

Citation Types

0
4
0

Year Published

2017
2017
2021
2021

Publication Types

Select...
2
1
1

Relationship

1
3

Authors

Journals

citations
Cited by 4 publications
(4 citation statements)
references
References 32 publications
0
4
0
Order By: Relevance
“…7) Derive the first order scattered paths from the mobile scatterers using their current position. 8) Calculate the channel transfer function as (12) combining all the paths depending on the desired system bandwidth and frequency spacing. 9) Update the position of the mobile scatterers for the next timestep.…”
Section: Implementation Recipementioning
confidence: 99%
See 2 more Smart Citations
“…7) Derive the first order scattered paths from the mobile scatterers using their current position. 8) Calculate the channel transfer function as (12) combining all the paths depending on the desired system bandwidth and frequency spacing. 9) Update the position of the mobile scatterers for the next timestep.…”
Section: Implementation Recipementioning
confidence: 99%
“…7 shows an exemplary geometry for a single time instant, where the diffuse scatterers are located adjacent to the smooth walls. The channel transfer functions (12) are derived for the same frequency band as measurements, i.e., between 2.45 and 2.75 GHz with 0.5 MHz resolution. The IFFT of the transfer function results in the band-limited CIRs.…”
Section: Channel Model Validationmentioning
confidence: 99%
See 1 more Smart Citation
“…Digital cancellers based on iterative optimisation have also been widely studied [9], [10]. To investigate the tracking performance of a typical iterative canceller a user interaction scenario, a least mean squares (LMS) based digital canceller has also been implemented (in place of the idealised digital canceller), as shown in Fig.…”
Section: Least Mean Squares Adaptive Digital Cancellermentioning
confidence: 99%