2011
DOI: 10.14742/ajet.896
|View full text |Cite
|
Sign up to set email alerts
|

Design and evaluation of two blended learning approaches: Lessons learned

Abstract: In this paper, we share two blended learning approaches used at the National Institute of Education in Singapore. We have been using these two approaches in the last twelve years in many courses ranging from the diploma to graduate programs. For the first blended learning approach, we integrated one asynchronous communication tool with face to face tutorials, classroom discussions, and a reflection session. For the second blended learning approach, we integrated two asynchronous tools with face to face tutoria… Show more

Help me understand this report

Search citation statements

Order By: Relevance

Paper Sections

Select...
2
1
1
1

Citation Types

2
31
0
4

Year Published

2012
2012
2021
2021

Publication Types

Select...
5
2
1

Relationship

0
8

Authors

Journals

citations
Cited by 62 publications
(42 citation statements)
references
References 15 publications
2
31
0
4
Order By: Relevance
“…Moreover, as students can initiate the discussion and build on the ideas of others, their epistemic agency (Scardamalia 2002) is important, which is consistent with the finding that a beneficial effect of BL is the development of students as independent learners (Snodin 2013). Compared to synchronous discussion that requires the co-presence of students at the same time, asynchronous discussion allows more flexibility for students to regulate their own pace of learning and have time for reflection, and is hence preferred by more instructors (Cheung and Hew 2011).…”
Section: Use Of Online Discussion In Blsupporting
confidence: 58%
See 2 more Smart Citations
“…Moreover, as students can initiate the discussion and build on the ideas of others, their epistemic agency (Scardamalia 2002) is important, which is consistent with the finding that a beneficial effect of BL is the development of students as independent learners (Snodin 2013). Compared to synchronous discussion that requires the co-presence of students at the same time, asynchronous discussion allows more flexibility for students to regulate their own pace of learning and have time for reflection, and is hence preferred by more instructors (Cheung and Hew 2011).…”
Section: Use Of Online Discussion In Blsupporting
confidence: 58%
“…One popular online component that can be found in the BL literature is the use of a computer-mediated platform for students to conduct asynchronous discussion (e.g. Chen and Looi 2007;Cheung and Hew 2011;Graham 2006). From a social constructivist approach (Vygotsky 1978), online discussion allows students to negotiate ideas and construct knowledge together, which are facilitative to their learning (Gunawardena, Lowe, and Anderson 1997).…”
Section: Use Of Online Discussion In Blmentioning
confidence: 99%
See 1 more Smart Citation
“…what training and development is there, these are the things that probably will make a better blended environment'. Further, apart from the use of technology, students need to be trained in their role as BL learners (Cheung and Hew 2011). Hence, as the higher standard for this criterion (Standard C on Table 2) states, students' technical capabilities should be identified in order for the appropriate training resources to be provided for using the online tools effectively.…”
Section: Supportmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…One reason is that studies of online PD utilize the same measures of effectiveness as in-person PD, such as qualitative data to understand interactions online like the sense of community among participants, or evaluate the effectiveness of the online learning environment (Cheung & Hew, 2011;Chitanana, 2012;Hew & Knapczyk, 2007;Parker, Maor, & Herrington, 2013). In these studies authors use mainly textual information and make use of the online environment as a means for intervention and a data collection point.…”
Section: Adding Value To Online Professional Development Research Thrmentioning
confidence: 99%