2018
DOI: 10.1021/acsmedchemlett.8b00538
|View full text |Cite
|
Sign up to set email alerts
|

Design and Evaluation of Heterobivalent PAR1–PAR2 Ligands as Antagonists of Calcium Mobilization

Abstract: A novel class of bivalent ligands targeting putative proteaseactivated receptor (PAR) heteromers has been prepared based upon reported antagonists for the subtypes PAR1 and PAR2. Modified versions of the PAR1 antagonist RWJ-58259 containing alkyne adapters were connected via cycloaddition reactions to azide-capped polyethylene glycol (PEG) spacers attached to imidazopyridazine-based PAR2 antagonists. Initial studies of the PAR1−PAR2 antagonists indicated that they inhibited G alpha q-mediated calcium mobilizat… Show more

Help me understand this report
View preprint versions

Search citation statements

Order By: Relevance

Paper Sections

Select...
1
1
1
1

Citation Types

1
4
0

Year Published

2020
2020
2024
2024

Publication Types

Select...
7
1

Relationship

0
8

Authors

Journals

citations
Cited by 12 publications
(5 citation statements)
references
References 39 publications
1
4
0
Order By: Relevance
“…It is possible that the movement of the tethered ligand into the binding site induces further conformational changes in the receptor, which might have a profound effect on the outside of the helical bundle where the high-affinity binding site of AZ3451 is located, explaining why AZ3451 induces partial inhibition of only the tethered ligand-activated state. A recent paper reported a similar finding, a PAR2 antagonist attached to a PEG linker partially inhibited SLIGKV-induced activation of Ca 2+ signalling via PAR2, with IC 50 = 0.1 µM, however, had no effect on trypsin-induced activation of PAR2 39 . Antagonists that can distinguish between peptide and protease-induced activation of PAR2 provide opportunities to improve our understanding of the endogenous mechanism of activation by proteases.…”
Section: Discussionsupporting
confidence: 59%
“…It is possible that the movement of the tethered ligand into the binding site induces further conformational changes in the receptor, which might have a profound effect on the outside of the helical bundle where the high-affinity binding site of AZ3451 is located, explaining why AZ3451 induces partial inhibition of only the tethered ligand-activated state. A recent paper reported a similar finding, a PAR2 antagonist attached to a PEG linker partially inhibited SLIGKV-induced activation of Ca 2+ signalling via PAR2, with IC 50 = 0.1 µM, however, had no effect on trypsin-induced activation of PAR2 39 . Antagonists that can distinguish between peptide and protease-induced activation of PAR2 provide opportunities to improve our understanding of the endogenous mechanism of activation by proteases.…”
Section: Discussionsupporting
confidence: 59%
“…In the absence of PAR2 activation by the agonist, AZ3451 had no effect on the basal activity of the receptor, which allows it to be considered as a NAM [266]. A similar pattern of activity is demonstrated by heterobivalent PAR1/PAR2 ligands, which are constructed based on PAR1-(RWJ-58259) and PAR2-antagonists (imidazopyridazine derivatives) crosslinked with polyethylene glycol [267]. Such constructs should affect the conformation of the PAR1 and PAR2 allosteric sites, which leads to the inhibition of Gq/11-mediated calcium mobilization in endothelial and cancer cells induced by PAR1-and PAR2-agonists.…”
Section: Small Allosteric Ligands Of Parsmentioning
confidence: 77%
“…In the absence of PAR2 activation by the agonist, AZ3451 had no effect on the basal activity of the receptor, which allows it to be considered as a NAM [ 269 ]. A similar pattern of activity is demonstrated by heterobivalent PAR1/PAR2 ligands, which are constructed based on PAR1- (RWJ-58259) and PAR2-antagonists (imidazopyridazine derivatives) cross-linked with polyethylene glycol [ 270 ]. Such constructs should affect the conformation of the PAR1 and PAR2 allosteric sites, which leads to the inhibition of G q/11 -mediated calcium mobilization in endothelial and cancer cells induced by PAR1- and PAR2-agonists.…”
Section: Allosteric Regulators Of Proteinase-activated Receptorsmentioning
confidence: 93%