2020
DOI: 10.1038/s42003-020-01504-0
|View full text |Cite
|
Sign up to set email alerts
|

Protease-activated receptor-2 ligands reveal orthosteric and allosteric mechanisms of receptor inhibition

Abstract: Protease-activated receptor-2 (PAR2) has been implicated in multiple pathophysiologies but drug discovery is challenging due to low small molecule tractability and a complex activation mechanism. Here we report the pharmacological profiling of a potent new agonist, suggested by molecular modelling to bind in the putative orthosteric site, and two novel PAR2 antagonists with distinctly different mechanisms of inhibition. We identify coupling between different PAR2 binding sites. One antagonist is a competitive … Show more

Help me understand this report

Search citation statements

Order By: Relevance

Paper Sections

Select...
3
1
1

Citation Types

0
25
0

Year Published

2021
2021
2024
2024

Publication Types

Select...
6
1

Relationship

1
6

Authors

Journals

citations
Cited by 20 publications
(27 citation statements)
references
References 43 publications
(77 reference statements)
0
25
0
Order By: Relevance
“…For example, AZ3451 was reported to have a lower IC 50 for Ca 2+ mobilization (nM) than for β-arrestin-2 recruitment (μM) and AZ8588 was reported to have a lower IC 50 for β-arrestin-2 recruitment than Ca 2+ mobilization. Both compounds inhibited inflammation to a similar extent in a paw edema model (Kennedy et al, 2020). The PAR2 antagonists from Vertex all inhibited PAR2-induced Gprotein but not β-arrestin signaling and show partial efficacy in mouse models of pain and subcutaneous inflammation (Avet et al, 2020;Jiang et al, 2018;Jimenez-Vargas et al, 2018).…”
Section: Discussionmentioning
confidence: 85%
See 1 more Smart Citation
“…For example, AZ3451 was reported to have a lower IC 50 for Ca 2+ mobilization (nM) than for β-arrestin-2 recruitment (μM) and AZ8588 was reported to have a lower IC 50 for β-arrestin-2 recruitment than Ca 2+ mobilization. Both compounds inhibited inflammation to a similar extent in a paw edema model (Kennedy et al, 2020). The PAR2 antagonists from Vertex all inhibited PAR2-induced Gprotein but not β-arrestin signaling and show partial efficacy in mouse models of pain and subcutaneous inflammation (Avet et al, 2020;Jiang et al, 2018;Jimenez-Vargas et al, 2018).…”
Section: Discussionmentioning
confidence: 85%
“…There are only a handful of PAR2 antagonists that have been developed [reviewed in (Yau, Lim, Liu & Fairlie, 2016)]. These include K-14585 (Goh, Ng, Nilsson, Kanke & Plevin, 2009;Kanke et al, 2005), GB88 (Hollenberg et al, 2014;Suen et al, 2012;Suen et al, 2014), two small molecules isolated from a large screening library (AC-55541 and AC-264613; (Gardell et al, 2008)), two PAR2 allosteric antagonists AZ8838 and AZ3451 from Astra Zeneca (Cheng et al, 2017;Kennedy et al, 2020), a group of small molecules: I-343, I-191 and I-287, from Vertex (Avet et al, 2020;Jiang et al, 2018;Jimenez-Vargas et al, 2018), and C391 (Boitano et al, 2015). C391 is distinct from these other antagonists in that it requires minimal pre-incubation for inhibition of multiple PAR2 signaling pathways.…”
Section: Discussionmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…There are only a handful of PAR2 antagonists that have been developed (reviewed in Yau et al, 2016). These include K‐14585 (Goh et al, 2009; Kanke et al, 2005); GB88 (Hollenberg et al, 2014; Suen et al, 2012); two PAR2 allosteric antagonists AZ8838 and AZ3451 from AstraZeneca (Cheng et al, 2017; Kennedy et al, 2020); a group of small molecules (I‐343, I‐191 and I‐287) from Vertex (Avet et al, 2020; Jiang et al, 2018; Jimenez‐Vargas et al, 2018); cell permeant PAR2 pepducin, 18S, that disrupts PAR2–G‐protein coupling (Sevigny et al, 2011); a monoclonal antibody, PAR650097 (Kopruszinski et al, 2020); and C391 (Boitano et al, 2015). We show herein that C391 effectively inhibits multiple signalling pathways associated with PAR2 signalling.…”
Section: Discussionmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…Proteins act through structural changes and drugs aim to block their action. A competitive drug binding mechanism is powerful since it directly blocks ligand docking 125,157–166 . A noncompetitive drug binding can be powerful by altering the active site shape, leading to the same outcome 167–177 .…”
Section: Molecular Activation Mechanism Matters In Drug Discoverymentioning
confidence: 99%
“…The modulation of the active site structure prompted by the allosteric drug restored effective binding to a competitive inhibitor 12 . Protease‐activated receptor‐2 (PAR2) provides another potential example 125 as does B‐Raf 126 . (iv) The drug can bind non‐covalently, which is the case most of the time, or especially in the absence of sufficiently deep pockets, it can be covalent 121,127–137 .…”
Section: Protein Structure‐based Moa Drug Classificationmentioning
confidence: 99%