2022
DOI: 10.1007/s11227-021-04191-8
|View full text |Cite
|
Sign up to set email alerts
|

Design and energy dissipation analysis of simple QCA multiplexer for nanocomputing

Help me understand this report

Search citation statements

Order By: Relevance

Paper Sections

Select...
2
1
1
1

Citation Types

0
17
0

Year Published

2022
2022
2023
2023

Publication Types

Select...
5
1

Relationship

1
5

Authors

Journals

citations
Cited by 13 publications
(17 citation statements)
references
References 29 publications
0
17
0
Order By: Relevance
“…But at γ = 1.0 E K and γ = 1.5 E K the best performed multiplexer is reported in [15] as the loss is 12.67 meV and 16.16 meV respectively. Additionally, at higher tunelling levels, the design in [13] performs well. The energy hotspot of multiplexers during this experiment is shown in Fig.…”
Section: Results Of Experiments Using Qcapromentioning
confidence: 95%
See 4 more Smart Citations
“…But at γ = 1.0 E K and γ = 1.5 E K the best performed multiplexer is reported in [15] as the loss is 12.67 meV and 16.16 meV respectively. Additionally, at higher tunelling levels, the design in [13] performs well. The energy hotspot of multiplexers during this experiment is shown in Fig.…”
Section: Results Of Experiments Using Qcapromentioning
confidence: 95%
“…Another piece of similar work which again examined the energy dissipation and cost of a multiplexer is [12]. A high-performance, straightforward 2:1 MUX without a majority gate or wire crossing was proposed by Khan and Arya for the year 2022 [13]. However, the described multiplexer in [13] should have a cell with a fixed polarization of -1, instead of +1, which is a layout error.…”
Section: Overview Of Qca Technologymentioning
confidence: 99%
See 3 more Smart Citations