“…Fractal DRAs are also investigated by many researchers 13–27 but suffer from low bandwidth, 13–21 for example, 7.1–9.26, 13 2.3845–2.5083 and 3.4056–4.831, 14 3.5–5.0, 15 9.0–11.5, 16 2.23–3.1, 17 2.25–2.60 and 3.10–4.10, 18 5.52–10.72, 19 4.0864–10.49, 20 and 2.6–4.34 GHz 21 . Few other research articles proposed fractal geometry‐based DRA in 22–27 and nonfractal‐based DRA 28,29 having wide impedance bandwidth 23,24,27 but, two problems are associated with them: (i) complex fabrication process and (ii) high fabrication cost, for example, 4–10.1, 22 3.3–13.4, 23 2.8–12, 24 3.5–5.6, 25 4.32–6.30, 26 and 4.8–20 GHz 27 . In two recent articles, the authors have proposed that DRAs have nonfractal structures and wide bandwidth for UWB operation, for example, 1.6–12.2, 28 3.8–9.05, and 10–11.5 GHz 29 but have a comparatively large complex structure and offer low efficiency.…”