2015 IEEE Applied Electromagnetics Conference (AEMC) 2015
DOI: 10.1109/aemc.2015.7509250
|View full text |Cite
|
Sign up to set email alerts
|

Design and development of a wideband tree shaped fractal dielectric resonator antenna

Help me understand this report

Search citation statements

Order By: Relevance

Paper Sections

Select...
2
1

Citation Types

0
9
0

Year Published

2017
2017
2024
2024

Publication Types

Select...
5

Relationship

1
4

Authors

Journals

citations
Cited by 8 publications
(9 citation statements)
references
References 5 publications
0
9
0
Order By: Relevance
“…17). An average gain of 6 dBi was reported in this work [121]. The presence of two printed patches with two air layers between the patches and the DR block led to the design of an antenna with a return loss bandwidth of 25.6%.…”
Section: Latest Trends In Dramentioning
confidence: 60%
“…17). An average gain of 6 dBi was reported in this work [121]. The presence of two printed patches with two air layers between the patches and the DR block led to the design of an antenna with a return loss bandwidth of 25.6%.…”
Section: Latest Trends In Dramentioning
confidence: 60%
“…Fractal DRAs are also investigated by many researchers 13–27 but suffer from low bandwidth, 13–21 for example, 7.1–9.26, 13 2.3845–2.5083 and 3.4056–4.831, 14 3.5–5.0, 15 9.0–11.5, 16 2.23–3.1, 17 2.25–2.60 and 3.10–4.10, 18 5.52–10.72, 19 4.0864–10.49, 20 and 2.6–4.34 GHz 21 . Few other research articles proposed fractal geometry‐based DRA in 22–27 and nonfractal‐based DRA 28,29 having wide impedance bandwidth 23,24,27 but, two problems are associated with them: (i) complex fabrication process and (ii) high fabrication cost, for example, 4–10.1, 22 3.3–13.4, 23 2.8–12, 24 3.5–5.6, 25 4.32–6.30, 26 and 4.8–20 GHz 27 . In two recent articles, the authors have proposed that DRAs have nonfractal structures and wide bandwidth for UWB operation, for example, 1.6–12.2, 28 3.8–9.05, and 10–11.5 GHz 29 but have a comparatively large complex structure and offer low efficiency.…”
Section: Introductionmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…Fractal DRAs are also investigated by many researchers [13][14][15][16][17][18][19][20][21][22][23][24][25][26][27] but suffer from low bandwidth, [13][14][15][16][17][18][19][20][21] for example, 7.1-9.26, 13 2.3845-2.5083 and 3.4056-4.831, 14 3.5-5.0, 15 9.0-11.5, 16 2.23-3.1, 17 2.25-2.60 and 3.10-4.10, 18 5.52-10.72, 19 4.0864-10.49, 20 and 2.6-4.34 GHz. 21 Few other research articles proposed fractal geometry-based DRA in [22][23][24][25][26][27] and nonfractal-based DRA 28,29 having wide impedance bandwidth 23,24,27 but, two problems are associated with them: (i) complex fabrication process and (ii) high fabrication cost, for example, 4-10.1, 22 3.3-13.4, 23 2.8-12, 24 3.5-5.6, 25 4.32-6.30, …”
mentioning
confidence: 99%
See 1 more Smart Citation
“…Based on the results of Ref., the authors have implemented fractal tree like geometry on T‐shaped DRA to achieve bandwidth improvement of about 14.8%. In Refs., the authors have discussed the tree fractal design and array design, respectively. In this letter, various parametric analysis, use of C‐shaped PDGS for low mutual coupling, and its fabricated results are discussed.…”
Section: Introductionmentioning
confidence: 99%