Design and Control of Battery Embedded Fourth-Order Boost Converter

Kumar, Deepak; Saxena, Anmol Ratna

doi:10.1109/pedes.2018.8707529

Cited by 6 publications

(7 citation statements)

References 18 publications

Supporting

Mentioning

Contrasting

Order By: Relevance

“…The main features compared are the number of SEs (switches and diodes), number of energy storage devices (inductors and capacitors), voltage gain, continuous source current, PC and PD features of battery, and efficiency. It is observed that the voltage gain of the proposed converter is higher than that of the converters having the same voltage gain as that of conventional boost converter (CBC) under isolated battery case (IBC) 16–28 . The number of elements used is low compared to other converters having the same gain as of CBC 21–23,28 or even with higher gain 26,27 .…”

Section: Introductionmentioning

confidence: 91%

“…BPDC Case with V o ≥ (V g + V B ): The total power input to the converter, given by (19), is equal to the sum of power delivered by the primary source and power delivered by the battery. Expressions for the output power and the losses are given by (20) and (21), respectively.…”

Section: Efficiency Calculationmentioning

confidence: 99%

“…Multiport dc-dc converters (MPCs) integrate the desired features (DISO and SIDO operation) in a single converter, thereby resulting in higher power density, higher efficiency, and compact design. [13][14][15][16][17][18][19][20][21][22][23][24][25][26][27][28][29][30][31][32] A review and analysis of MPC and battery-integrated converters for renewable energy application were given by Bhattacharjee et al 13 and Deihimi and Mahmoodieh. 14 Topologies for conversion into MPC are explored by Kwasinski, 15 while a systematic approach to derive three-port converter (TPC) topologies having dualinput and dual-output feature was also presented [16][17][18] Chien et al 26 proposed a high-voltage gain TPC using eight switching devices (SDs) and five passive energy storage elements (PESEs), including one coupled inductor.…”

Section: Introductionmentioning

confidence: 99%

“…It is observed that the voltage gain of the proposed converter is higher than that of the converters having the same voltage gain as that of conventional boost converter (CBC) under isolated battery case (IBC). [16][17][18][19][20][21][22][23][24][25][26][27][28] The number of elements used is low compared to other converters having the same gain as of CBC [21][22][23]28 or even with higher gain. 26,27 Also, the proposed converter has the low number of switches.…”

Section: Introductionmentioning

confidence: 99%

“…However, either class or type of converters only partially serves the purpose of power management. Multiport dc‐dc converters (MPCs) integrate the desired features (DISO and SIDO operation) in a single converter, thereby resulting in higher power density, higher efficiency, and compact design 13–32 . A review and analysis of MPC and battery‐integrated converters for renewable energy application were given by Bhattacharjee et al 13 and Deihimi and Mahmoodieh 14 .…”

Section: Introductionmentioning

confidence: 99%

See 4 more Smart Citations

Design and control of a reconfigurable high‐gain battery integrated dc‐dc boost converter for time‐varying loads

Saxena

Kumar

2020

Circuit Theory & Apps

Self Cite

View full text Add to dashboard Cite

In this paper, a reconfigurable, low component count high-gain battery integrated dc-dc boost converter (HGBIBC) is proposed for power management of time-varying loads (TVLs). The battery is integrated between the two switches and the two diodes, which provides an inherent feature of pulse-charging and pulse-discharging of the battery, thereby increasing its lifetime. The converter operation, in various modes, is explained, and the steady-state and timedomain analyses are performed to establish the high-voltage gain feature of the converter, which makes it suitable for interfacing sources with low output voltages. The guidelines for the design of converter parameters and selection of switching devices are presented. Small-signal models are derived, and the relative gain array (RGA) analysis is performed, which revealed that the control loops are of decoupled nature and hence the controllers, for each loop, can be designed independently, as in the case of a single-input single-output (SISO) converter. The PID controllers are designed to simultaneously regulate the load voltage and source current. The theoretical concepts developed in the paper are validated experimentally using the laboratory prototype of the converter. The experimental results, demonstrating power management, at load voltages of 60 and 48 V are presented, which are found to be in close correlation with the theoretical and simulation studies. K E Y W O R D S battery integrated converters, battery power management, battery pulse charging (BPC), battery pulse discharging (BPD), high-gain boost converter, multiport converter

show abstract

Section: Introductionmentioning

confidence: 91%

Section: Efficiency Calculationmentioning

confidence: 99%

Section: Introductionmentioning

confidence: 99%

Section: Introductionmentioning

confidence: 99%

Section: Introductionmentioning

confidence: 99%

See 3 more Smart Citations

Design and control of a reconfigurable high‐gain battery integrated dc‐dc boost converter for time‐varying loads

Saxena

Kumar

2020

Circuit Theory & Apps

Self Cite

View full text Add to dashboard Cite

show abstract

Transformerlesshigh‐gain battery‐integratedDC‐DCboost converter forfuel‐cellstacks: Design, analysis, and control

Saxena

Kumar

2020

Int Trans Electr Energ Syst

Self Cite

View full text Add to dashboard Cite

Summary Owing to the non‐linear voltage‐current characteristics of the fuel cells, power conditioning of the fuel cell becomes essential before feeding the power to electrical loads. Therefore, in this article, a transformerless high‐gain battery‐integrated dc‐dc boost converter (THGBIBC) is proposed and analyzed for the power conditioning of the fuel‐cell stacks. The proposed converter reduces the input‐current ripple, achieves high voltage gain, and maintains the steady voltage across the load. Moreover, a battery is integrated between the two switches and the two diodes to mitigate the effect of time‐varying loads. The circuit configuration, operation, and steady‐state analysis of the proposed THGBIBC is presented for different switching scenarios for power transfer. The procedure for the design of converter parameters and the selection of switching devices are also presented. The discrete‐time mathematical model of the proposed converter is developed and two decoupled control loops are designed to simultaneously regulate the fuel‐cell stack current and load voltage. Loop pairing of control variables (duty ratios) and output variables (fuel‐cell stack current and load voltage) is established using a relative gain array approach. The control laws are realized using TMS320F28335 DSP and the experimental results for 48 V regulated loads are obtained which are in close agreement with theoretical analysis and simulation results.

show abstract

Non-Isolated Fourth-Order Boost DC-DC Converter for Power Management in Low Voltage Low Power DC Grids: Design and Interaction Analysis

2020

View full text Add to dashboard Cite

In this paper, a minimum-phase response fourth-order boost dc-dc converter (FBDC) exhibiting continuous input and output current is proposed. A voltage-mode controller is adopted to this converter to perform bus voltage regulation in a low voltage low power dc distribution system (LVPDS). FBDC supports additional load demand by interconnecting a second power source/battery. A systematic steady-state analysis for FBDC is established and the ripple content and other L-C design expressions are derived. The LVPDS is an integration of solar photovoltaic (PV) source using a conventional dc-dc boost converter (CBDC), and constant power load using a conventional dc-dc buck converter (CBuC). In this LVPDS, the FBDC primarily ensures dc bus voltage regulation, CBDC ensures the maximum power point tracking (MPPT) while CBuC regulates the load voltage. Various transfer function models, formulated through small-signal analysis, are used to address the controller design aspects and interconnected LVPDS stability issues. A generalized small-signal model of LVPDS is also developed to analyze the subsystem interactions arising during the coherent operation of BRC in this multi-converter system. The impact of connecting FBDC, as BRC, with other converters in the LVPDS is also analyzed. The laboratory prototype of a 48 V LVPDS is developed for experimental validation of bus voltage regulation and subsystem interactions. The theoretical and experimental results are found to be in close correlation with each other. INDEX TERMS Fourth-order DC-DC Boost converter, Small-signal model, power stage design optimization, Particle swarm optimization, Low voltage low Power dc distribution systems NOMENCLATURE Bus voltage regulating converter BRC Bus voltage and Bus-side current vbus, ibus Conventional boost converter CBDC Characteristics Equation LVPDS CE Control-to-bus volt TF of BRC Gvd(s)B-o, Continuous input continuous output CICO Equivalent bus impedance of source and load converter Z(s)SL

show abstract

Design and Control of Battery Embedded Fourth-Order Boost Converter

Cited by 6 publications

References 18 publications

Design and control of a reconfigurable high‐gain battery integrated dc‐dc boost converter for time‐varying loads

Design and control of a reconfigurable high‐gain battery integrated dc‐dc boost converter for time‐varying loads

Transformerlesshigh‐gain battery‐integratedDC‐DCboost converter forfuel‐cellstacks: Design, analysis, and control

Non-Isolated Fourth-Order Boost DC-DC Converter for Power Management in Low Voltage Low Power DC Grids: Design and Interaction Analysis

Contact Info

Product

Resources

About