2010
DOI: 10.1118/1.3378478
|View full text |Cite
|
Sign up to set email alerts
|

Design and comparison of two eight‐channel transmit/receive radiofrequency arrays for in vivo rodent imaging on a 7 T human whole‐body MRI system

Abstract: The results show that both coil designs are suitable for small animal imaging on 7 T whole-body systems; the preferred coil depends on the demands of the application.

Help me understand this report

Search citation statements

Order By: Relevance

Paper Sections

Select...
3
1

Citation Types

1
9
0

Year Published

2011
2011
2023
2023

Publication Types

Select...
7
1

Relationship

0
8

Authors

Journals

citations
Cited by 12 publications
(10 citation statements)
references
References 24 publications
1
9
0
Order By: Relevance
“…Recently, an eight‐channel body array for a 9.4 T animal scanner has been described (16). Similar increase in number of coil elements can be observed in rat MRI applications using 8‐ and 16‐channel body arrays (17–19). Extending the capabilities of parallel imaging to higher accelerations requires the implementation of a miniature design and solving the challenges of a high density coil with on‐coil preamplifiers.…”
supporting
confidence: 68%
“…Recently, an eight‐channel body array for a 9.4 T animal scanner has been described (16). Similar increase in number of coil elements can be observed in rat MRI applications using 8‐ and 16‐channel body arrays (17–19). Extending the capabilities of parallel imaging to higher accelerations requires the implementation of a miniature design and solving the challenges of a high density coil with on‐coil preamplifiers.…”
supporting
confidence: 68%
“…10 The preamplifier decoupling method can alleviate the mutual coupling in receiver arrays, 9 however, it is not readily feasible in transceiver arrays. 11 Capacitive and inductive decoupling networks introduced between two adjacent coil elements are often employed to compensate for the mutual coupling. [12][13][14][15][16][17] This method requires a dedicated circuit connecting adjacent coil with lumped L=C elements whose values can become impractically small especially at ultrahigh magnetic fields.…”
Section: Introductionmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…The lowimpedance preamplifier decoupling approach 19 and digital post-processing techniques 20 can reduce mutual coupling in receiver arrays, but not applicable to transmit arrays. 21,22 Shielded array designs 23 and capacitive or inductive networks [24][25][26][27][28] are also available, but typically require additional space or physical connections between coils, precluding independent functioning of each coil and for cylindrical array coils, critically decreasing the usable imaging volume. 23 Although some recent work has demonstrated effective decoupling techniques without physical connection between RF array elements, using induced current compensation or elimination, [29][30][31] or even self-decoupled RF coils, 32 these methodologies are more applicable to surface coils rather than volume coils.…”
Section: Decoupling Approaches For Concentric Solenoidsmentioning
confidence: 99%