2010
DOI: 10.1016/j.precisioneng.2010.04.002
|View full text |Cite
|
Sign up to set email alerts
|

Design and characterization of MIKES metrological atomic force microscope

Help me understand this report

Search citation statements

Order By: Relevance

Paper Sections

Select...
3
1
1

Citation Types

0
44
0

Year Published

2011
2011
2018
2018

Publication Types

Select...
5
4

Relationship

0
9

Authors

Journals

citations
Cited by 57 publications
(44 citation statements)
references
References 28 publications
0
44
0
Order By: Relevance
“…1, which defines the coordinate system of the instrument. Experience in characterizing mSPMs at other metrology institutes [4][5][6][7][8][9] has shown that the metrological frame is the dominant source of measurement uncertainties arising from alignment errors, particularly Abbé errors and nonorthogonality of the measurement axes, and environmental vibration. To achieve the target total uncertainty of dimensional measurements, minimizing these contributions is a principal consideration in the design of the metrological frame and the material selected for its construction.…”
Section: System Integrationmentioning
confidence: 99%
See 1 more Smart Citation
“…1, which defines the coordinate system of the instrument. Experience in characterizing mSPMs at other metrology institutes [4][5][6][7][8][9] has shown that the metrological frame is the dominant source of measurement uncertainties arising from alignment errors, particularly Abbé errors and nonorthogonality of the measurement axes, and environmental vibration. To achieve the target total uncertainty of dimensional measurements, minimizing these contributions is a principal consideration in the design of the metrological frame and the material selected for its construction.…”
Section: System Integrationmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…1,2 The challenge in realizing this mSPM concept is to create a macroscopic mechanical instrument capable of traceable dimensional measurement at the nanoscale with a combined uncertainty of less than 1 nm. Experience in designing ultraprecision mechanical stages and instruments 3 and in operating similar mSPMs at other metrology institutes [4][5][6][7][8][9] has shown that there are many contributions to the uncertainty of the displacement measurements. These include alignment errors (particularly Abbé errors 10 ), deformations of the mechanical structures (for instance, due to thermal expansion), motion errors of the translation stage, form errors of the interferometer mirrors, nonlinearities of the interferometers, and fluctuations in the refractive index of air.…”
Section: Introductionmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…Scanning over an area below approximately 1 x 1 mm can be done with PZT driven flexture stages with virtually no backlash, and sensitivity and resolution on the nm level or better [10,11]. The design of the stage relies on flexible joints and suffers from the presence of angle deviations over the scanning range.…”
Section: Conceptsmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…This so-called short-range metrological SPM employs a piezo-driven stage held on flexure joints with virtually no backlash, and with high sensitivity [3], [4]. Here, the positioning range is below 1 mm.…”
Section: Introductionmentioning
confidence: 99%