2021
DOI: 10.1007/s10404-021-02426-x
|View full text |Cite
|
Sign up to set email alerts
|

Design and application of a self-pumping microfluidic staggered herringbone mixer

Help me understand this report

Search citation statements

Order By: Relevance

Paper Sections

Select...
2
1
1
1

Citation Types

0
6
0

Year Published

2022
2022
2023
2023

Publication Types

Select...
8
1

Relationship

1
8

Authors

Journals

citations
Cited by 14 publications
(6 citation statements)
references
References 54 publications
0
6
0
Order By: Relevance
“…3D printing also enables the use of non-planar architectures, which is a significant advancement in the historically planar design approach to microfluidics. For example herringbone structures have been used in straight 41 and curved channels 16 for self-pumping and to induce mixing control, yet NG-MICS represents the first 3D implementation of these structures as a way to counteract parasitic Dean flow focusing.…”
Section: Discussionmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…3D printing also enables the use of non-planar architectures, which is a significant advancement in the historically planar design approach to microfluidics. For example herringbone structures have been used in straight 41 and curved channels 16 for self-pumping and to induce mixing control, yet NG-MICS represents the first 3D implementation of these structures as a way to counteract parasitic Dean flow focusing.…”
Section: Discussionmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…These features create disturbances in the laminar flow, inducing chaotic advection and secondary flow within the channel [50,51]. For example, expansion-contraction cavity arrays, such as the staggered herringbone mixer (SHM), slanted groove mixer (SGM), and barrier-embedded mixer (BEM), introduce spatial perturbations and create secondary flow patterns to enhance mixing efficiency [52][53][54][55]. The use of slanted grooves in the SGM generates a short-pitched spiral flow, improving mixing efficiency [55].…”
Section: Geometry-assistedmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…Passive micromixers have two common types. One is lamination-based mixers [464] and the other types are chaotic advection-based mixers [465], 3D serpentine mixers [466], zigzag or waveform mixers [467], micromixers with patterned blocks [468], obstacles [469], staggered herringbones [470], etc. For laminationbased mixers, T-shaped and Y-shaped are the broadly investigated devices, in which their main inlet channels can be split into several sub-streams and then recombined to form the main stream [471,472].…”
Section: Enhancing Microchannel Mixing and Separationmentioning
confidence: 99%