2018
DOI: 10.1109/tifs.2017.2774761
|View full text |Cite
|
Sign up to set email alerts
|

Design and Analysis of Stability-Guaranteed PUFs

Abstract: Abstract-The lack of stability is one of the major limitations that constrains Physical Unclonable Function (PUF) from being put in widespread practical use. In this paper, we propose a weak PUF and a strong PUF that are both completely stable with 0% intra-distance. These PUFs are called Locally Enhanced Defectivity Physical Unclonable Function (LEDPUF). The source of randomness of a LEDPUF is extracted from locally enhance defectivity without affecting other parts of the chip. A LEDPUF is a pure functional P… Show more

Help me understand this report

Search citation statements

Order By: Relevance

Paper Sections

Select...
2
2
1

Citation Types

1
24
0

Year Published

2019
2019
2023
2023

Publication Types

Select...
6
1

Relationship

1
6

Authors

Journals

citations
Cited by 34 publications
(25 citation statements)
references
References 67 publications
(104 reference statements)
1
24
0
Order By: Relevance
“…Unfortunately, most of them are noisy PUFs requiring error correction mechanisms. In 2017, Wang et al [53] proposed Locally Enhanced Defectivity Physical Unclonable Function (LEDPUF), which is a stability-guaranteed PUF that needs no error correction techniques. In Wang et al [53], weak LEDPUF and strong LEDPUF were both presented.…”
Section: Implementation Discussionmentioning
confidence: 99%
See 1 more Smart Citation
“…Unfortunately, most of them are noisy PUFs requiring error correction mechanisms. In 2017, Wang et al [53] proposed Locally Enhanced Defectivity Physical Unclonable Function (LEDPUF), which is a stability-guaranteed PUF that needs no error correction techniques. In Wang et al [53], weak LEDPUF and strong LEDPUF were both presented.…”
Section: Implementation Discussionmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…In 2017, Wang et al [53] proposed Locally Enhanced Defectivity Physical Unclonable Function (LEDPUF), which is a stability-guaranteed PUF that needs no error correction techniques. In Wang et al [53], weak LEDPUF and strong LEDPUF were both presented. As discussed in Section 5.2.6, our proposed protocol can defend against modeling attacks.…”
Section: Implementation Discussionmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…On the other hand, Guesswork incorporates the effect of bias and noise into a single measure that enables us to evaluate how much they affect the security level. This interplay is presented for the ρth moment of guesswork in [18] by the following equation…”
Section: And Explaining What the Differences Between What They Evaluamentioning
confidence: 99%
“…case the min-entropy is Hmin (X) = − log 2 (max (PX )) = − 1 m log 2 (P r (G (X) = 1)) . (9) In addition, it is shown in [18] that min-entropy also captures the average guesswork for strong PUFs under model building attacks.…”
Section: And Explaining What the Differences Between What They Evaluamentioning
confidence: 99%
“…The advantages and applications of PUFs initiated a search for methods of harvesting of PUF keys from physical processes. Among proposed solutions, we can find: ring oscillators [7,9], transient effect ring oscillators [10], dynamic ring oscillators [11], ordering-based ring oscillator [12], convergence time of bistable rings [8], sneak paths in the resistive X-point array [13], power consumption differences of Advanced Encryption Standard Sbox inversion functions [14], occurrence of metastability [15], static memory [16,17], dynamic memory [18,19], switching behavior of emerging magneto-resistive memory devices [20], switching of resistive random access memory [21], reduction-oxidation resistive switching memories [22], decay-based Dynamic Random Access Memory [23], locally enhanced defectivity [24], combination of multiplexers and arbiters [25], wireless sensors [26], Complementary Metal-Oxide Semiconductor image sensors [27], nonlinearities of data converters [28], mismatch of capacitor ratios [29], primitive shifting permutation network (barrel shifter) [30], cellular neural networks [31], customized dynamic two-stage comparator [32], and many others.…”
Section: Introductionmentioning
confidence: 99%